Hi,

On 07/07/17 04:40, Daniel Sangorrin wrote:

Hi Agustin, Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: cip-dev-bounces@... [mailto:cip-dev-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Agustin Benito Bethencourt
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 5:21 PM
To: cip-dev@...
Subject: Re: [cip-dev] Project-X (minimal root filesystem) for renesas board

Hi,

On 29/06/17 02:37, Daniel Sangorrin wrote:

Hi Koguchi-san,

-----Original Message-----
From: 小口琢夫 / KOGUCHI，TAKUO [mailto:takuo.koguchi.sw@...]
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 6:08 PM
To: 'Daniel Sangorrin'; cip-dev@...
Cc: 'Chris Paterson'
Subject: RE: RE: Project-X (minimal root filesystem) for renesas board

Daniel-san,

I think this is not a good approach. We would need to have a new linux-cip folder for each
release.

Let make it clear. Will you please describe your recommendation?

Yes, please see below.

Patches for the cyclone board should be on its own CIP kernel repository (where you can
merge cip releases and add tags). Then, we can choose which version we want by
specifying the repository and tag/commit_id.

Good point. But CIP kernel repository is curerntly used for release assuming it is tested. And CycloneV is not supported by CIP at

this

moment. So I put the patches in the yocto project way.

I didn't mean to put it on Ben's CIP repository rather on github. This way you can better maintain your "out-of-tree" cyclone V

patches

and merge (do not rebase please) changes from Ben's CIP kernel regularly. In other words, do the same as Renesas is doing at [1].

[1] https://github.com/renesas-rz/renesas-cip

In order to have all the cip related code in one place, it would be
good, if anybody is using github, that at least there is a mirror of
that repo in gitlab. When we start automating builds/test, that would be
helpful.

Agustin: I don't mind, but is this necessary?.

Necessary? not in my opinion. I think that development should take place whenever is best for the developers.

Two considerations:

TSC agreed to use Gitlab for mainly one reason: services built with gitlab can be replicated by Members in-house. That is not the case for GitHub.

Once the code is developed and the developer want to distribute it in the context of the CIP, CIP needs to host the source code and the binaries for compliance reasons. In that case having a mirror in GitLab would be a requirement.

Chris: Will you create another repository for u-boot?

Thanks,
Daniel

I don't think it is necessary since the CIP root filesystem only supports a few packages.
Do you mind if I rewrite this and other unnecessary definitions?

I am happy if you go ahead and fix it!

OK, thanks. I will also separate Beaglebone from Cyclone V.

Thanks,
Daniel

Best regards,
Takuo Koguchi

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Sangorrin [mailto:daniel.sangorrin@...]
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 5:52 PM
To: 小口琢夫 / KOGUCHI，TAKUO; cip-dev@...
Cc: 'Chris Paterson'
Subject: [!]RE: Project-X (minimal root filesystem) for renesas board

Ho Koguchi-san

-----Original Message-----
From: 小口琢夫 / KOGUCHI，TAKUO [mailto:takuo.koguchi.sw@...]
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 5:35 PM
To: Daniel Sangorrin; cip-dev@...
Cc: 'Chris Paterson'
Subject: RE: Project-X (minimal root filesystem) for renesas board

Hi Daniel-san,

I have a few questions:
- Why do you have two directories "linux-cip" and "linux-cip2" that are almost

identical?

linux-cip directory is for linux-4.4.55-cip3.
linux-cip2 is for the previous release and it is not necessary if you update linux-cip.

I think this is not a good approach. We would need to have a new linux-cip folder for each
release.

Patches for the cyclone board should be on its own CIP kernel repository (where you can
merge cip releases and add tags). Then, we can choose which version we want by
specifying the repository and tag/commit_id.

- I can see some xserver-related definitions on the board's
configuration file. Are those necessary?

beaglebone.conf is based on poky/meta-yocto-bsp/conf/machine.
xserver-related definition was inculude in the original. I am not sure if it is necessary.

I don't think it is necessary since the CIP root filesystem only supports a few packages.
Do you mind if I rewrite this and other unnecessary definitions?

Thanks,
Daniel

Takuo Koguchi

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Sangorrin [mailto:daniel.sangorrin@...]
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 4:05 PM
To: cip-dev@...; 小口琢夫 / KOGUCHI，TAKUO
Cc: 'Chris Paterson'
Subject: [!]Project-X (minimal root filesystem) for renesas board

Hi Koguchi-san,
Cc: Chris, cip-dev

I'm going to add support to project-X for the Renesas iwg20m board
which is equipped with an armv7 chip.
I have noticed that you added support for beaglebone and cyclone on
the deby-armv7 folder [1].

I have a few questions:
- Why do you have two directories "linux-cip" and "linux-cip2" that are almost

identical?

- I can see some xserver-related definitions on the board's
configuration file. Are those necessary?

Thanks,
Daniel

[1]
https://gitlab.com/cip-playground/project-x/tree/master/deby-armv7

_______________________________________________
cip-dev mailing list
cip-dev@...
https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev

--
Agustin Benito Bethencourt
Principal Consultant - FOSS at Codethink
agustin.benito@...
_______________________________________________
cip-dev mailing list
cip-dev@...
https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev

--
Agustin Benito Bethencourt
Principal Consultant - FOSS at Codethink
agustin.benito@...