Re: [PATCH 4.4.y-cip 00/11] ti-cpufreq backport


Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
 

Hi,

-----Original Message-----
From: Pavel Machek [mailto:pavel@denx.de]
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 4:04 PM
To: Chen-Yu Tsai (Moxa) <wens@csie.org>
Cc: iwamatsu nobuhiro(岩松 信洋 □SWC◯ACT) <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>; pavel@denx.de;
cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org; JohnsonCH.Chen@moxa.com; victor.yu@moxa.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4.y-cip 00/11] ti-cpufreq backport

Hi!

This is the final part of MOXA's PM / OPP / ti-cpufreq backport series.
Part 2, which consisted of OPP / cpufreq-dt cleanups, is abandoned in
favor of directly backporting the ti-cpufreq driver.

This part includes a couple of patches to the PM / OPP subsystem to
expose required APIs, and deal with the v1/v2 mixed OPP table used
by am33xx. The rest are the backport of the ti-cpufreq driver, and
fixes for this driver. The fixes were requested by CIP kernel
maintainers as part of MOXA's previous attempt to backport ti-cpufreq.
They are included as separate patches, as there are quite a few of them
spread over multiple kernel releases.

The result is that my BeagleBone Black can run at higher speeds than
without the ti-cpufreq driver due to having a better silicon
revision.
The series looks good to me. I can apply it if it passes testing and
there are no other comments.
This patch series looks good to me too.
So, I applied and pushed.


Best regards,
Pavel
Best regards,
Nobuhiro

Join cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org to automatically receive all group messages.