On 09.08.21 15:49, Gylstorff Quirin wrote:

On 8/9/21 2:54 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:

On 09.08.21 12:29, Q. Gylstorff wrote:

From: Quirin Gylstorff <quirin.gylstorff@...>

efibootguard-dev is only a build time dependency and
not an runtime dependency.

Signed-off-by: Quirin Gylstorff <quirin.gylstorff@...>
---
  classes/swupdate-config.bbclass | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/classes/swupdate-config.bbclass
b/classes/swupdate-config.bbclass
index dfa3579..e4879c7 100644
--- a/classes/swupdate-config.bbclass
+++ b/classes/swupdate-config.bbclass
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ KFEATURE_DEPS[luahandler] = "lua"
    KFEATURE_efibootguard = ""
  KFEATURE_efibootguard[BUILD_DEB_DEPENDS] = "efibootguard-dev"
-KFEATURE_efibootguard[DEBIAN_DEPENDS] = "efibootguard-dev"
+KFEATURE_efibootguard[DEBIAN_DEPENDS] = ""
  KFEATURE_efibootguard[DEPENDS] = "efibootguard-dev"
  KFEATURE_efibootguard[KCONFIG_SNIPPETS] =
"file://swupdate_defconfig_efibootguard.snippet"
 

-dev makes no sense, but don't we have any dep on libs? Or are they
statically linked?

It is statically linked - efibootguard-dev contains only libebgenv.a.

Ah, yeah, part the SWUpdate's problems...

Thanks, applied.

Jan

--
Siemens AG, T RDA IOT
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux