Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release v5.10.83-cip1 / First release of the CIP 5.10.y Linux kernel
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 6:36 PM Alice Ferrazzi via lists.cip-project.org <alice.ferrazzi=miraclelinux.com@...> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 8:24 AM Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
> <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > We release v5.10.83-cip1, which is the first release of the CIP 5.10.y Linux kernel !
> > This is based on v5.10.83 with some additional updates for the Renesas reference
> > boards.
> > You can get this release via the git tree at:
> > v5.10.83-cip1:
> > repository:
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/linux-cip.git
> > branch:
> > linux-5.10.y-cip
> > commit hash:
> > 2332f07a324fd78d7c7436deeed23cd7db441ea7
> > added commits:
> > CIP: Add a number to the version suffix
> > dt-bindings: pci: rcar-pci-ep: Document missing interrupts property
> > dt-bindings: timer: renesas: tmu: Document r8a774e1 bindings
> > dt-bindings: PCI: rcar-pci-host: Document r8a774e1 bindings
> > memory: renesas-rpc-if: Make rpcif_enable/disable_rpm() as static inline
> > spi: spi-mem: Fix passing zero to 'PTR_ERR' warning
> > clk: renesas: r8a774a1: Add RPC clocks
> > clk: renesas: r8a774b1: Add RPC clocks
> > clk: renesas: r8a774c0: Add RPC clocks
> > pinctrl: renesas: r8a77990: Add QSPI pins, groups and functions
> > pinctrl: renesas: r8a77990: Optimize pinctrl image size for R8A774C0
> > pinctrl: renesas: r8a77951: Add QSPI pins, groups and functions
> > pinctrl: renesas: r8a77951: Optimize pinctrl image size for R8A774E1
> > pinctrl: renesas: r8a7796: Add QSPI pins, groups and functions
> > pinctrl: renesas: r8a7796: Optimize pinctrl image size for R8A774A1
> > pinctrl: renesas: r8a77965: Add QSPI pins, groups and functions
> > pinctrl: renesas: r8a77965: Optimize pinctrl image size for R8A774B1
> > Add configuration for gitlab-ci.
> In the link here under there is the difference with Linux stable v5.10.83:
> Other than having linux-5.10.y-cip tested on more boards,
> respectively 164 builds vs 184 builds for CIP kernel.
> We could also test CIP kernel on arm64,
> Linux stable looks not yet tested on arm64 with KernelCI.
> I currently don't see any relevant difference from both build tests.
From KernelCI log, we had two regressions on the baseline-nfs test on linux-5.10.83-cip1 from
so we don't have a comparison for this test.
The logs can be found here:
Cybertrust Japan Co.,Ltd.