On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 11:02 +0000, Fabrizio Castro wrote:
Since the same carrier board may host RZ/G1M and RZ/G1N based Systems on Module, the DT architecture for iwg20d-q7 needs better decoupling. This patch provides: * iwg20d-q7-common.dtsi - its purpose is to define the carrier board definitions, and its content is basically the same as the previous version of r8a7743-iwg20d-q7.dts, only it has no reference to the SoM .dtsi, and that's why the filename doesn't mention the SoC name any more. * r8a7743-iwg20d-q7.dts - its new purpose is to put together the SoM .dtsi (r8a7743-iwg20m.dtsi) and the carrier board .dtsi defined by this very patch, along with "model" and "compatible" properties. The final DT architecture to describe the board is now: r8a7743-iwg20d-q7.dts # Carrier Board + SoM ├── r8a7743-iwg20m.dtsi # SoM │ └── r8a7743.dtsi # SoC └── iwg20d-q7-common.dtsi # Carrier Board and maximizes the reuse of the definitions for the carrier board and for the SoM.
I got a conflict at this point. It looks like this series has to be applied on top of the SDHI changes, which you posted later! Please be explicit about any such ordering dependencies.