Hi, maybe we can start the support of our promo efforts with a Twitter account. I would also think about a hashtag Best Regards -- Agustin Benito Bethencourt Principal Consultant - FOSS at

Hi Ben,

Hi, it has now been published in the CIP site:

Dear CIP friends, here is the report of those tasks related with Testing and kernel maintenance that we have been working on the past two weeks: The whole team has been in Manchester for a week and

Fell through my cracks as well, just sending out another internal call for more product configs. One is attached already, derived from github.com/siemens/meta-iot2000. Xenomai is not in CIP scope

Sorry for the late reply! Please find attached an x86 kernel configuration from early product development using kernel 4.4. This product uses nearly-COTS server hardware due to needed

Thank you. I have limited knowledge of u-boot, but I did work on it recently to add support for a new board. [...] We should certainly pick one version for each reference board. If u-boot is

Hi Chris, thanks for raising this question. The problem you describe does not just exist for U-Boot, but also for many other components that we will be looking into. I also assume that updating the

On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 03:39 +0000, 河合英宏 / KAWAI，HIDEHIRO wrote: [...] > I attached a defconfig for one of our products running on 4.4.12. > This config is based on omap2plus_defconfig, and a

On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 16:32 +0000, Chris Paterson wrote: [...] > From an SoC vendor point of view, ideally we'd like the interfaces > provided by the reference platform to be included. As support for

Hello Agustin and Ben, I attached a defconfig for one of our products running on 4.4.12. This config is based on omap2plus_defconfig, and a diff from omap2plus_defconfig is also attached. Currently,

Hi, Slightly related to this topic, Ben H. gave a talk/Q&A about hardware support in Debian Stable back in DebConf13 Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLTs1ikQR5E -- Agustin Benito

Hello Agustin, Ben, Sorry for the slow response to your query. From an SoC vendor point of view, ideally we'd like the interfaces provided by the reference platform to be included. As support for

I've released Linux version 4.4.55-cip3. There are no new CIP-specific changes; this just adds the fixes from stable versions 4.4.49-4.4.55 inclusive. I reviewed those fixes, but have only done very

Hello all, I’m bringing a discussion I’ve started in other places here as it will benefit from wider participation. As you know the aim of CIP is to maintain not just the Kernel, but a

Hi, Answering this question is important to discard features in 4.4 that are not of CIP interest so we can severely reduce the amount of effort that we will need to do in terms of fixes analysis,

Dear CIP friends, here is the report of those tasks related with Testing and kernel maintenance that Don, Ben, Robert and myself has been working on the past two weeks: CIP Testing * Investigation

Also, I'm not talking about backports here - only about which of the existing features in 4.4 will need SLTS. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Software Developer, Codethink Ltd.

But you don't use *all* the IIO drivers, do you? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Software Developer, Codethink Ltd.

Hi, we published a blog post to promote CIP and also to explain why Codethink Ltd. is part of it. link: