Thank you! But I don't see anything new at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/linux-cip.git/ . Did you forget to push or is it still processing? Best regards, Pavel --

Hi, Biju. You do not need to send. This patch has been reviewed and committed to linux-4.19.y-cip branch by me. Best regards, Nobuhiro

Hi Pavel, Thanks for the feedback. This patch "arm64: dts: renesas: Initial device tree for r8a774c0" have

Hi, all. This was depended patch in charge. I already applied and push to linux-4.19.y-cip branch. Best regards, Nobuhiro ________________________________________ 差出人:

Hi, all. I applied this series, thanks. Best regards, Nobuhiro

This does not apply. My kernel still has: while this expects... way higher number. I tried to look at pending patches in patchwork, that maybe if I tried to apply everything it would work, but could

I could not apply this on c312fd1d432e36f9012127fe3c1d2b7023afae48-based tree. I have struct sh_pfc_pin_group common[117]; while the patch expects struct sh_pfc_pin_group common[123]; --

Hi! I could not apply this, as arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a774c0.dtsi does not exist in my tree. Plus, you are pushing spdx comment changes. I guess it is ok if it makes your life easier,

This does not apply. -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

This fails for me, because arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a774c0.dtsi does not yet exist. -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office:

This one rejected when I tried applying it. Pavel -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell,

Thanks, applied. -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

I prefer directly including good commit (rather than including bad commit and then fixing it up). Let me try to fix it up. Anyway, I merged this and the rest of the series. -- DENX Software

Thanks, I applied the series. -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

Hi, Last week I went to the Linaro connect in Bangkok and had very interesting meetings and conversations with other test engineers. I also gave a talk [1] that included several Demos using the CIP

Hi, I have added a Software updates comparison report to our wiki: https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/civilinfrastructureplatform/cip_comparison_report This comparison is mostly based on other

Hello Pavel,

This is something that seems more suited for the CIP kernel as it adds new functionality. -- Thanks, Sasha

Hi! Ok, so first patch adds support for using "delayed" DHCP replies, then there are three more patches to fix up issues it creates. Which tells me that maybe this is not quite suitable for

From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...> commit 1ae292a2457cd692828da2be87cb967260993ad0 upstream. If no RARP, BOOTP, or DHCP response is received, ic_dev is never set, causing a NULL