Ben Hutchings pushed to branch masterat cip-project / cip-kernel / cip-kernel-secCommits: 3ed9dc6d by Daniel Sangorrinat 2019-06-17T20:14:31Zremotes: refer to configuration filesThe Readme indicated

I've applied this and the following patch, as they're obviously correct. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Software Developer   Codethink Ltd https://www.codethink.co.uk/

On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 14:51 +0900, Daniel Sangorrin wrote: [...] > --- a/scripts/kernel_sec/branch.py > +++ b/scripts/kernel_sec/branch.py [...] > +def check_git_repo(git_repo, remotes,

I've been promising for some time to provide a way to identify which changes on Linux stable branches are relevant to CIP members, and conversely which are irrelevant and don't need to be

From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...> commit 089bd46d8bc1fe5a28351e82e4adcaa5a40121b5 upstream. Kbuild test robot reports: drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c: In function ‘setup_cs’:

Hi all, CIP kernel team has released Linux kernel 4.19.52-cip4 and 4.4.182-cip34 for SACK Panic[0]. You can get this release via the git tree at: 4.19.52-cip4: repository:

Hi!

Allow reporting on cip branches, instead of returning an error like this one: $ ./scripts/report_affected.py linux-4.4.y-cip Traceback (most recent call last): File "./scripts/report_affected.py",

Hello Ben,

This patch introduces some checks for the local git repository containing the remotes configured in conf/remotes.yml These checks occur at the beginning of import_stable.py, report_affected.py and

The example and implementation use a colon (:) to specify remote mappings, but the command's help use the equal sign (=). Signed-off-by: Daniel Sangorrin <daniel.sangorrin@...> ---

Probably a copy&paste error that never got checked because nobody is using the mapping functionality. Signed-off-by: Daniel Sangorrin <daniel.sangorrin@...> ---

Hi all, Kindly be reminded to attend the weekly meeting through IRC to discuss technical topics with CIP kernel today. *Please note that IRC meeting was rescheduled to UTC (GMT) 09:00 starting from

I wouldn't see it that extreme, it still heavily depends on what you are running and where. Also, the attacks are getting more complex. Anyway, different while similar topic: Is there a plan to

Currently trying to update Isar instead, now that your patch is in next. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

Hello CIP lovers, lab-cip-renesas and the LAVA master is back up and running. Kind regards, Chris

[...] Right. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Software Developer   Codethink Ltd https://www.codethink.co.uk/ Dale House, 35 Dale Street

I thought I'd tested this. :-( Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Software Developer   Codethink Ltd https://www.codethink.co.uk/ Dale House, 35 Dale Street

This mostly looks fine, except:

wrote: Actually these two functions aren't exactly the same, since the default return value differs. In practice that doesn't make a difference at the moment, but logically it would be wrong to