From: Quirin Gylstorff <quirin.gylstorff@...> Add the rzg2m reference board. Add the option to build rootfs tarballs for LAVA tests. This option needs to be activated in the gitlab-ci.yml

SZ Lin (林上智) pushed to branch masterat cip-project / cip-kernel / cip-kernel-secCommits: 9f11fbee by SZ Lin (林上智)at 2019-10-14T11:40:54ZImport data from Debian and Ubuntu

Hello all, Just a heads up that the Renesas LAVA lab (lab-cip-renesas) will be offline for 2/3 hours on the morning of the 13th November, from around 1000 GMT onwards. Our hardware is being PAT

Thank you Ben. Looping in the mailing list for general interest. Kind regards, Chris

Hi all, The release was delayed, sorry. CIP kernel team has released Linux kernel v4.19.80-cip13 and v4.4.196-cip38. The linux-4.19.y-cip tree has been updated from base version from 4.19.78 to

Hi Pavel & Nobuhiro-San , Do you want me to send the patches instead of [1]? Please let me know. [1]. https://gitlab.com/bijud/emmc Regards, Biju

Hi All, RZ/G1C eMMC IP is different from other RZ/G1 SoC's. It is having an internal DMA for data transfer which is similar to R-Car Gen3. Support for internal DMAC is added in 4.14 kernel and

Hi all, In another email, there is a discussion on how to manage the gitlab-ci.yaml file, but I apply these patches and linux-4.19.y-cip as they are now needed for testing. Best regards,

Hi Pavel Hmm... indeed. Thank you for your report. I will re-check code, and post patch Thank you for your help !! Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto

Hi Pavel Which range ?? for SRCIN ? I'm not sure it make sense. Can you send use case ?? Thank you for your help !! Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto

Ok, but again, could it be next to the patch it fixes? Thanks, Pavel -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194

Ok, but... Should the if ((chan > 8) || (chan < 0)) ever be true in practice? Sounds like bogus inputs to me. Should we dev_err() and return error in those cases? Or at least WARN_ON()? Best

Hi! I'd prefer this to be need the patch it fixes, too. Thanks, Pavel -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5,

Could this be moved near the patch it fixes? Or even merged to it? Introducing deadlocks is bad for bisection at the very least... Best regards, Pavel -- DENX Software Engineering

Hi! ... ... If error happens, would it make sense to propagate it back to the caller? Best regards, Pavel -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235

Hi! Would it still make sense to test that i is in expected range? #define CHECK_RANGE(i) ({ WARN_ON(i<0 || i>4); i; }) #define SRCIN_TIMSEL(i) (SRCIN_TIMSEL0 + (i)) ... Thanks and

Hello Pavel, Just to let you know, the arm64 boards are currently offline in the Renesas LAVA lab. I'm working to get them online again, but the impact will be that your test jobs will eventually

Hi! I applied the patches. Tests are still running ( https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-kernel/linux-cip/pipelines/91254170 ) but I don't expect problems there. Best regards, Pavel -- DENX

Hi, SZ-san, Yes, please close this AI. Thanks very much for your cooperation. Best regards, -- M. Kudo

Hi Kudo-san, Thanks for you heads up. For now, we’re waiting for your patches. So I think we can close this AI if you have no objection. SZ