|
Camera CSI support for IMX
Hello,
We are using Linux-CIP Kernel Version 4.19.140-cip33. We do not find IMX
files in the Kernel supporting Camera Capture through CSI.Could you get
us how the support can be added?
Thanks and
Hello,
We are using Linux-CIP Kernel Version 4.19.140-cip33. We do not find IMX
files in the Kernel supporting Camera Capture through CSI.Could you get
us how the support can be added?
Thanks and
|
By
Rajashree Sankar <rajashree.sankar@...>
·
#5588
·
|
|
Re: Bluetooth CVEs deciphered?
Hi!
I believe I indentified the other 2 fixes, too. Here's updated diff.
Best regards,
Pavel
diff --git a/issues/CVE-2020-12351.yml b/issues/CVE-2020-12351.yml
index 63f8b60..a28487e
Hi!
I believe I indentified the other 2 fixes, too. Here's updated diff.
Best regards,
Pavel
diff --git a/issues/CVE-2020-12351.yml b/issues/CVE-2020-12351.yml
index 63f8b60..a28487e
|
By
Pavel Machek
·
#5587
·
|
|
Backport c797110d for CVE-2020-25645 [net: geneve]
Backport c797110d for CVE-2020-25645.
This ... builds. I would not mind getting some testing here.
Best regards,
Pavel
diff --git a/drivers/net/geneve.c b/drivers/net/geneve.c
index
Backport c797110d for CVE-2020-25645.
This ... builds. I would not mind getting some testing here.
Best regards,
Pavel
diff --git a/drivers/net/geneve.c b/drivers/net/geneve.c
index
|
By
Pavel Machek
·
#5586
·
|
|
CVE-2020-24490: backporting a2ec905d to 4.4.
CVE-2020-24490: backporting a2ec905d to 4.4.
Yes, "ext_adv" is always false here, so code could be simplified, but
I believe this is good enough for -stable.
Best regards,
Pavel
diff
CVE-2020-24490: backporting a2ec905d to 4.4.
Yes, "ext_adv" is always false here, so code could be simplified, but
I believe this is good enough for -stable.
Best regards,
Pavel
diff
|
By
Pavel Machek
·
#5585
·
|
|
Bluetooth CVEs deciphered?
Hi!
I believe Google has good information which CVE corresponds to which
patch, and I used that to improve cip-kernel-sec. Result is here. Can
you take a look before I start fighting yml?
Best
Hi!
I believe Google has good information which CVE corresponds to which
patch, and I used that to improve cip-kernel-sec. Result is here. Can
you take a look before I start fighting yml?
Best
|
By
Pavel Machek
·
#5584
·
|
|
Re: [RFC PATCH 4.19.y-cip 41/50] PCI: rcar: Add endpoint mode support
Hi!
Yes, thank you.
checkpatch should not be an excuse for crazy code... and this one is
crazy.
Sleep has nowhere near microsecond accuracy. If you can tolerate
bigger delay, feel free to specify
Hi!
Yes, thank you.
checkpatch should not be an excuse for crazy code... and this one is
crazy.
Sleep has nowhere near microsecond accuracy. If you can tolerate
bigger delay, feel free to specify
|
By
Pavel Machek
·
#5583
·
|
|
Re: [RFC PATCH 4.19.y-cip 41/50] PCI: rcar: Add endpoint mode support
Hi Pavel,
Thank you for the review.
Hi Pavel,
Thank you for the review.
|
By
Lad Prabhakar
·
#5582
·
|
|
Re: [RFC PATCH 4.19.y-cip 00/50] Add PCIe EP support for Renesas R-Car Gen3 and RZ/G2x
Hi Pavel,
By
Lad Prabhakar
·
#5581
·
|
|
Re: If you are using PCIe EP, speak up was Re: [RFC PATCH 4.19.y-cip 00/50] Add PCIe EP support for Renesas R-Car Gen3 and RZ/G2x
Hi Pavel,
By
Lad Prabhakar
·
#5580
·
|
|
CIP IRC weekly meeting today
Hi all,
Kindly be reminded to attend the weekly meeting through IRC to discuss technical topics with CIP kernel today.
*Please note that the IRC meeting was rescheduled to UTC (GMT) 09:00 starting
Hi all,
Kindly be reminded to attend the weekly meeting through IRC to discuss technical topics with CIP kernel today.
*Please note that the IRC meeting was rescheduled to UTC (GMT) 09:00 starting
|
By
masashi.kudo@cybertrust.co.jp <masashi.kudo@...>
·
#5579
·
|
|
Re: Backporting of security patches for Intel i40e drivers required?
Given that Intel's security notice did not state which patches fixed which
issues, nor which commits caused them, I tried to guess which patch fixed
which issue, based solely on their descriptions.
Given that Intel's security notice did not state which patches fixed which
issues, nor which commits caused them, I tried to guess which patch fixed
which issue, based solely on their descriptions.
|
By
Chen-Yu Tsai (Moxa) <wens@...>
·
#5578
·
|
|
Re: Backporting of security patches for Intel i40e drivers required?
Hi!
It is interesting this one is listed in both CVE-145, CVE-147 in
cip-kernel-sec. Is that an error?
I see also
- i40e: Set RX_ONLY mode for unicast promiscuous on VLAN
which apparently allows
Hi!
It is interesting this one is listed in both CVE-145, CVE-147 in
cip-kernel-sec. Is that an error?
I see also
- i40e: Set RX_ONLY mode for unicast promiscuous on VLAN
which apparently allows
|
By
Pavel Machek
·
#5577
·
|
|
Re: [RFC PATCH 4.19.y-cip 00/50] Add PCIe EP support for Renesas R-Car Gen3 and RZ/G2x
Hi!
I have no good ideas how to avoid rename.
Given the change in locking previously in the series, manual review of
changes in this area might be good idea, anyway.
In 4.19, there were 75 patches
Hi!
I have no good ideas how to avoid rename.
Given the change in locking previously in the series, manual review of
changes in this area might be good idea, anyway.
In 4.19, there were 75 patches
|
By
Pavel Machek
·
#5576
·
|
|
If you are using PCIe EP, speak up was Re: [RFC PATCH 4.19.y-cip 00/50] Add PCIe EP support for Renesas R-Car Gen3 and RZ/G2x
Hi!
I quickly went through a series and code seems reasonably nice.
And yes, it is quite big, which might be a problem. OTOH only Renesas
seems to have PCIe EP drivers enabled in their CIP
Hi!
I quickly went through a series and code seems reasonably nice.
And yes, it is quite big, which might be a problem. OTOH only Renesas
seems to have PCIe EP drivers enabled in their CIP
|
By
Pavel Machek
·
#5575
·
|
|
Re: [RFC PATCH 4.19.y-cip 41/50] PCI: rcar: Add endpoint mode support
Hi!
Comment not according to CodingStyle.
Plain 0 would be enough
This is crazy. Either you need exact timing or you don't, but I don't
believe usleep can guarantee microsecond accuracy.
(And you
Hi!
Comment not according to CodingStyle.
Plain 0 would be enough
This is crazy. Either you need exact timing or you don't, but I don't
believe usleep can guarantee microsecond accuracy.
(And you
|
By
Pavel Machek
·
#5574
·
|
|
Re: [cip-kernel-sec 3/3] issues: fill in the description field of remaining CVEs
<daniel.sangorrin@...> wrote:
Not at all. I'm merely stating that the descriptions match a known source.
ChenYu
<daniel.sangorrin@...> wrote:
Not at all. I'm merely stating that the descriptions match a known source.
ChenYu
|
By
Chen-Yu Tsai (Moxa) <wens@...>
·
#5573
·
|
|
Re: [cip-kernel-sec 3/3] issues: fill in the description field of remaining CVEs
Hello Chen-yu,
Thanks for your check.
Hello Chen-yu,
Thanks for your check.
|
By
Daniel Sangorrin <daniel.sangorrin@...>
·
#5572
·
|
|
FW: [Automated-testing] RFC: dashboards, visualization and analytics for test results
FYI
Please feel free to add any use cases or comments to the mail thread below from KernelCI.
Kind regards, Chris
FYI
Please feel free to add any use cases or comments to the mail thread below from KernelCI.
Kind regards, Chris
|
By
Chris Paterson
·
#5571
·
|
|
[RFC PATCH 4.19.y-cip 50/50] tools: PCI: Fix fd leakage
From: Hewenliang <hewenliang4@...>
commit 3c379a59b4795d7279d38c623e74b9790345a32b upstream.
We should close fd before the return of run_test.
Fixes: 3f2ed8134834 ("tools: PCI: Add a
From: Hewenliang <hewenliang4@...>
commit 3c379a59b4795d7279d38c623e74b9790345a32b upstream.
We should close fd before the return of run_test.
Fixes: 3f2ed8134834 ("tools: PCI: Add a
|
By
Lad Prabhakar
·
#5570
·
|
|
[RFC PATCH 4.19.y-cip 49/50] tools: PCI: Exit with error code when test fails
From: Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@...>
commit b71f0a0b1e3fea212a6a5042ced8b48a81738ac9 upstream.
This makes it easier to use pcitest in automated setups.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Hiblot
From: Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@...>
commit b71f0a0b1e3fea212a6a5042ced8b48a81738ac9 upstream.
This makes it easier to use pcitest in automated setups.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Hiblot
|
By
Lad Prabhakar
·
#5569
·
|