From: Nguyen Van Hieu <hieu2.nguyenvan@...> Currently some descriptions are quite long, and it is hard to read. Add line-breaks so every line is at most 80 characters long. Signed-off-by:

From: nguyen van hieu <hieu2.nguyenvan@...> When using the --show-description option CVEs had blank lines between them. Remove them to make it more compact. Signed-off-by: nguyen van hieu

I had this in the backlog for a long time. These patches, improve the way CVEs' descriptions are displayed when calling scripts/report_affected.py with the option --show-description` enabled. [1/3]

Hi Pavel, 2020年9月24日(木) 19:17 Pavel Machek <pavel@...>: Thanks for your work. It looks like there is no issue. Best regards, Nobuhiro -- Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwamatsu at {nigauri.org

Hi! Backport to 4.4 was very easy (there was single dev_err that prevented patch for applying), and backported patch tests

Hi Kudo-san, Sorry, I will be absent IRC meeting today. SW Updates WG don't have any updates this week. Thanks, Suzuki

Hi all, Kindly be reminded to attend the weekly meeting through IRC to discuss technical topics with CIP kernel today. *Please note that the IRC meeting was rescheduled to UTC (GMT) 09:00 starting

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:23 AM, Venkata Pyla wrote: Hi Daniel-san, I have created the merge request for all the security layer changes including your suggestions. Kindly review and letme know if

Hi, Jan-san, Thanks for your quick response! When we discussed at the IRC, the config carrying rbd/ceph is only 4.4-rt x86. So, I understood that the backporting is not required. Best

Not to my best knowledge. This is very likely an accidental choice. Is that the only config in our repo carrying rbd/ceph? The we should likely drop that, to be clear also in the future. Jan --

Hi, Jan-san, Siemens team, There was some query to Siemens about the need of CVE-2020-25284 backporting. - CVE-2020-25284 is in rbd ( Ceph block device ). - it is only fixed for v4.19 and later

Why not using an undefined or empty IMAGE_UUID as "generate me one" indication? Is that namespace random, or does that have specific meaning? Please separate variable for job definitions be a blank

From: Quirin Gylstorff <quirin.gylstorff@...> BB_BASEHASH only includes the task itself and its metadata. Dependencies are not taken into account when this hash is generated which means

HI Daniel-san, Thank you for your feedback. sorry for spell checks issues in the commits, I will correct it and send another merge request. Also I will apply other security configuration

Hi Kudo-san, Sorry, I will be absent today's IRC meeting because I've got a plan already today. SW Updates WG don't have any updates this week. Thanks, Suzuki

Thanks, it looks good. Perhaps you can write in the commit id what is the effect in size compared to not using static compilation. Please send me a merge request

Thanks, it looks good Please send me a merge request

Hi Venkata-san Please check my inline comments and send me a merge request when you solve them.

Hi all, Kindly be reminded to attend the weekly meeting through IRC to discuss technical topics with CIP kernel today. *Please note that the IRC meeting was rescheduled to UTC (GMT) 09:00 starting

From: venkata pyla <venkata.pyla@...> To build aide statically, its dependencies also compile staticalliy, so all aide dependent library packages enabled static compiling in an include