Hi, After today's CIP weekly meeting, Pavel proposed the idea of skipping merge requests for the cip-kernel-sec repository: 17:25 < pave1> wens: I see that currently merges to cip-kernel-sec are

Hi all, Kindly be reminded to attend the weekly meeting through IRC to discuss technical topics with CIP kernel today. *Please note that the IRC meeting was rescheduled to UTC (GMT) 09:00 starting

Hi Pavel, Thank you for the review.

Hi Pavel, Thank you for the review.

Hi! Whoa. So... original patch _moved_ shared code to new place. This version creates another copy of shared code, probably subtly different from the other one. Is that good idea? Won't two copies

Hi! Is this used somewhere? This adds symbol but noone calls this, and AFAICT it is not used in the rest of the series, either. We can merge it, anyway, I guess, but... explanation would be

Hi! Okay, we can't really protect sleeping code with a mutex. But this one is not sleeping. It is mdelay(), not msleep(). And same here. If there's a place which does sleep with the spinlock held,

Hello Jan, Thanks for the details. This gives us an idea on what we could do next. Thanks for your immediate support. We will get in touch with NXP for this. Regards, Lakshmi CONFIDENTIALITY This

Hi Lakshmi, That's unfortunate. Yes, please reach out to NXP and ask what their answer for upstream is, today or at least for the future. It's their issue in the first place. Also for that, you

Hello Jan, This is regarding requests for CSI support in the IMX processor. We were using Yocto + NXP provided kernel to use the CSI peripheral of the IMX6 processor. We have complete support from NXP

Hi Pavel,

Hi Pavel,

Hi Pavel,

Hi! Well... I applied this batch. If someone can explain the mutex vs. spinlock thing, then I guess we can do next batch up to 35... OTOH I did not go through those patches in detail, and RFC is

Hi! Could I get some kind of explanation why this is good idea? As long as code protected by the locks does not sleep, spinlocks are okay... (but they should not need "_irqsave" variants). They are

Hi! Thanks, applied and pushed out. Our automated testing did not find anything wrong (but I don't think that means much). Best regards, Pavel -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH,

From: Hewenliang <hewenliang4@...> commit 3c379a59b4795d7279d38c623e74b9790345a32b upstream. We should close fd before the return of run_test. Fixes: 3f2ed8134834 ("tools: PCI: Add a

From: Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@...> commit b71f0a0b1e3fea212a6a5042ced8b48a81738ac9 upstream. This makes it easier to use pcitest in automated setups. Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Hiblot

From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...> commit 6f5e193bfb55963ce5f4f68cc927f371ddb0913b upstream. commit beb4641a787d ("PCI: dwc: Add MSI-X callbacks handler"), in order to raise MSI-X

From: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...> commit f58d5f53c89479c12ad719c1960176442add5aaa upstream. After an endpoint is started through configfs, if 0 is written to the configfs entry