Thanks Chris for the update! Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...> writes: As mentioned on the #cip channel the new version is now in place and has been tested. Agustín - can I go ahead and

Of course, but including them in buster will add another 2 years to the time these architectures have to be supported. For what it's worth, the SIGMINSTKSZ issue is fixed in 4.20 by: 22839869f21a

Hello all, Some updates from the CIP testing world… # B@D # - Robert has continued to close down issues on GitLab [1] that are either fixed or won’t be fixed in time for his

Hi, Please find the logs of CIP meeting last week in below link: https://irclogs.baserock.org/cip/%23cip.2018-11-22.log.html#t2018-11-22T09:00:05 SZ Lin, Moxa

Ben Hutchings pushed to branch masterat cip-project / cip-kernel / cip-kernel-secCommits: 7cc54e1f by Ben Hutchingsat 2018-11-19T16:48:55ZExtend lists of commits fixing CVE-2018-1128 and

61508 starts out with the top layer wich is actually technology agnostic - simply put if we do not understand the system then it can´t be adequately safe - so part 1 does not talk about HW/SW at

Hi Clive, this is very helpful, thank you. I'm going to re-add the other lists, for the same reason as before, and hope you're ok with that. Please see my comments inline below... Understood, and I'd

Hi Paul I'll have a go at your question - FYI my background is system safety management (as in 61508 & DO178) and coding standards (MISRA & JSF++) You are right that ultimately system safety is a

Hi again... Sadly most of the followon discussion seems to have stayed only on systemsafetylist.org [1] which rather reduces its impact IMO. I cross-posted in the hope that knowledge from the safety

Hi SZ, I won't be able to attend the meeting today. I just sent a few e-mails for the CIP Software update workgroup and the CIP Core workgroup on the members list. I want to continue that

Hi All, Kindly be reminded to attend weekly meeting through IRC to discuss technical topics with CIP kernel today. *Please note that IRC meeting was rescheduled to 18:00 (JST) starting from first

Good to know, thank you Chris.

Now to attempt to answer the question... Some initiatives have already started down this road, for example SIL2LINUXMP (in cc) But my personal perspective is 1) it may be the the certifications

While systemsafety may be the leading community for public discussion around systems (and software) safety, it is not the only ML that has an interest in this topic so I'm cross-posting to some other

Hi Nobuhiro, Hmm, that message does not yet read to me like a blocker. It's a list of complications, yes. I also wonder what makes this buster-specific. The issues with the build environment should

Hello all, It was asked last week about if it is possible to keep jobs secret in the CIP LAVA test setup. Test results/definitions can indeed be kept private, either on an individual or group

Hi, 2018年11月19日(月) 17:53 Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...>: We can see the current hardware problem of armel / armhf from the

Hi, There are SSGs that digest .md https://about.gitlab.com/2016/06/10/ssg-overview-gitlab-pages-part-2/ this way the report can also be visualized not just as a static page but also as a repo

I don't think you can update a .md file via gitlab-ci. Though there is GitLab pages which seems to be the thing for creating documentation via a CI/CD

Hi, If you can put the patches list as a repo on gitlab, and since the target repo is already being mirrored, I wonder if we can create a job that executes the script when the origin list gets