|
New CIP Blog Post
CIP Community:
This month, we are featuring Moxa in CIP’s Member Spotlight series. You read the blog here: https://www.cip-project.org/blog/2018/05/30/cip-member-spotlight-moxa.
If you’d like to
CIP Community:
This month, we are featuring Moxa in CIP’s Member Spotlight series. You read the blog here: https://www.cip-project.org/blog/2018/05/30/cip-member-spotlight-moxa.
If you’d like to
|
By
Maemalynn Meanor <maemalynn@...>
·
#1257
·
|
|
[PATCH 4.4-cip 2/2] watchdog: Fix kref imbalance seen if handle_boot_enabled=0
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...>
commit 914d65f3f013ba2556c7beec5d3baac7b3292504 upstream.
If handle_boot_enabled is set to 0, the watchdog driver module use
counter will not be increased
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...>
commit 914d65f3f013ba2556c7beec5d3baac7b3292504 upstream.
If handle_boot_enabled is set to 0, the watchdog driver module use
counter will not be increased
|
By
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...>
·
#1256
·
|
|
[PATCH 4.4-cip 1/2] watchdog: Fix potential kref imbalance when opening watchdog
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...>
commit 4bcd615fad6adddc68b058d498b30a9e0e0db77a upstream.
If a watchdog driver's open function sets WDOG_HW_RUNNING with the
expectation that the watchdog
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...>
commit 4bcd615fad6adddc68b058d498b30a9e0e0db77a upstream.
If a watchdog driver's open function sets WDOG_HW_RUNNING with the
expectation that the watchdog
|
By
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...>
·
#1255
·
|
|
[PATCH 4.4-cip 0/2] watchdog refcount fixes
I noticed two stable fixes for the watchdog core that fix bugs
introduced by commits backported to 4.4-cip (but not 4.4-stable). So
I should apply these fixes unless the backports somehow avoided
I noticed two stable fixes for the watchdog core that fix bugs
introduced by commits backported to 4.4-cip (but not 4.4-stable). So
I should apply these fixes unless the backports somehow avoided
|
By
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...>
·
#1254
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: r8a7743: Add VSP support
By
Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@...>
·
#1253
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 07/11] ARM: dts: r8a7743: Add thermal device to DT
Hello Ben,
Thanks for the feedback.
Hello Ben,
Thanks for the feedback.
|
By
Biju Das <biju.das@...>
·
#1252
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 07/11] ARM: dts: r8a7743: Add thermal device to DT
The thermal-zones node this adds was later moved by commit b9db3affbcdc
("ARM: dts: r8a7743: move timer and thermal-zones nodes out of bus").
Do you think that is worth applying too?
Ben.
[...]
--
The thermal-zones node this adds was later moved by commit b9db3affbcdc
("ARM: dts: r8a7743: move timer and thermal-zones nodes out of bus").
Do you think that is worth applying too?
Ben.
[...]
--
|
By
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...>
·
#1251
·
|
|
Re: [RFC PATCH 7/7] ARM: shmobile: defconfig: Enable missing support based on DTSes
Hi Ben,
Thanks for the feedback.
Hi Ben,
Thanks for the feedback.
|
By
Biju Das <biju.das@...>
·
#1250
·
|
|
Re: [RFC PATCH 7/7] ARM: shmobile: defconfig: Enable missing support based on DTSes
OK, that makes sense.
[...]
The impact should be none, for those platforms. :-)
I'm happy with this patch series. Patch 6 should go to 4.4-stable, but
I can also apply it to 4.4-cip without
OK, that makes sense.
[...]
The impact should be none, for those platforms. :-)
I'm happy with this patch series. Patch 6 should go to 4.4-stable, but
I can also apply it to 4.4-cip without
|
By
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...>
·
#1249
·
|
|
Re: [RFC PATCH 7/7] ARM: shmobile: defconfig: Enable missing support based on DTSes
Hi Ben,
Thanks for the feedback.
Hi Ben,
Thanks for the feedback.
|
By
Biju Das <biju.das@...>
·
#1248
·
|
|
Re: [RFC PATCH 7/7] ARM: shmobile: defconfig: Enable missing support based on DTSes
Why not apply the whole of the commit (that hasn't already been
applied)? I understand that we don't need all these things enabled for
the reference hardware, but this is meant to be a generic
Why not apply the whole of the commit (that hasn't already been
applied)? I understand that we don't need all these things enabled for
the reference hardware, but this is meant to be a generic
|
By
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...>
·
#1247
·
|
|
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] 'SKB reserve' quirk setup to u_ether
The USB DMAC driver is present, so I think patch 6 should go to 4.4-
stable. For the rest, I agree they can be added to 4.4-cip only.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Software Developer
The USB DMAC driver is present, so I think patch 6 should go to 4.4-
stable. For the rest, I agree they can be added to 4.4-cip only.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Software Developer
|
By
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...>
·
#1246
·
|
|
[PATCH v2 11/11] ARM: dts: iwg20m: Enable cmt0
From: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@...>
This patch enables cmt0 support from within the iwg20m SoM dtsi.
Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@...>
Reviewed-by:
From: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@...>
This patch enables cmt0 support from within the iwg20m SoM dtsi.
Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@...>
Reviewed-by:
|
By
Biju Das <biju.das@...>
·
#1245
·
|
|
[PATCH v2 10/11] ARM: dts: r8a7743: Add CMT SoC specific support
From: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@...>
Add CMT[01] support to SoC DT.
Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@...>
Reviewed-by: Biju Das
From: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@...>
Add CMT[01] support to SoC DT.
Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@...>
Reviewed-by: Biju Das
|
By
Biju Das <biju.das@...>
·
#1244
·
|
|
[PATCH v2 09/11] clockevents/drivers/sh_cmt: Set ->min_delta_ticks and ->max_delta_ticks
From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...>
In preparation for making the clockevents core NTP correction aware,
all clockevent device drivers must set ->min_delta_ticks and
->max_delta_ticks rather
From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...>
In preparation for making the clockevents core NTP correction aware,
all clockevent device drivers must set ->min_delta_ticks and
->max_delta_ticks rather
|
By
Biju Das <biju.das@...>
·
#1243
·
|
|
[PATCH v2 08/11] clocksource: sh_cmt: Compute rate before registration again
From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...>
With the upcoming NTP correction related rate adjustments to be implemented
in the clockevents core, the latter needs to get informed about every
From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...>
With the upcoming NTP correction related rate adjustments to be implemented
in the clockevents core, the latter needs to get informed about every
|
By
Biju Das <biju.das@...>
·
#1242
·
|
|
[PATCH v2 07/11] ARM: dts: r8a7743: Add thermal device to DT
This patch instantiates the thermal sensor module with thermal-zone
support.
This patch is based on the commit cac68a56e34b
("ARM: dts: r8a7791: enable to use thermal-zone") by Kuninori
This patch instantiates the thermal sensor module with thermal-zone
support.
This patch is based on the commit cac68a56e34b
("ARM: dts: r8a7791: enable to use thermal-zone") by Kuninori
|
By
Biju Das <biju.das@...>
·
#1241
·
|
|
[PATCH v2 06/11] dt-bindings: thermal: rcar: Add device tree support for r8a7743
Add thermal sensor support for r8a7743 SoC. The Renesas RZ/G1M
(r8a7743) thermal sensor module is identical to the R-Car Gen2 family.
No driver change is needed due to the fallback compatible
Add thermal sensor support for r8a7743 SoC. The Renesas RZ/G1M
(r8a7743) thermal sensor module is identical to the R-Car Gen2 family.
No driver change is needed due to the fallback compatible
|
By
Biju Das <biju.das@...>
·
#1240
·
|
|
[PATCH v2 05/11] thermal: rcar_thermal: don't call thermal_zone_device_unregister when USE_OF_THERMAL
From: Bui Duc Phuc <bd-phuc@...>
devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register() case doesn't need to call
thermal_zone_device_unregister().
Otherwise, rcar-thermal can't register thermal zone again
From: Bui Duc Phuc <bd-phuc@...>
devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register() case doesn't need to call
thermal_zone_device_unregister().
Otherwise, rcar-thermal can't register thermal zone again
|
By
Biju Das <biju.das@...>
·
#1239
·
|
|
[PATCH v2 04/11] thermal: rcar-thermal: enable hwmon when thermal_zone_of_sensor_register is used
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...>
rcar-thermal is supporting both thermal_zone_of_sensor_register() and
thermal_zone_device_register(). But
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...>
rcar-thermal is supporting both thermal_zone_of_sensor_register() and
thermal_zone_device_register(). But
|
By
Biju Das <biju.das@...>
·
#1238
·
|