|
Resource describing the Deby workflow?
Hi! Notice that in this case SSL is not adding as much security as you think it does. SSL attempts to protect against active attackers, and those can manipulate NTP easily. Best regards, Pavel
Hi! Notice that in this case SSL is not adding as much security as you think it does. SSL attempts to protect against active attackers, and those can manipulate NTP easily. Best regards, Pavel
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #4995
·
|
|
[PATCH 4.19.y-cip 00/17] Add RZ/G2E Dual LVDS display
Hi! Applied, thanks for patches. Best regards, Pavel
Hi! Applied, thanks for patches. Best regards, Pavel
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #4993
·
|
|
CIP IRC weekly meeting today
Hi! I should be able to attend the meeting, but in case reality interferes: I have reviewed patches for 4.19.134. Best regards, Pavel
Hi! I should be able to attend the meeting, but in case reality interferes: I have reviewed patches for 4.19.134. Best regards, Pavel
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #4982
·
|
|
[PATCH 4.19.y-cip 00/17] Add RZ/G2E Dual LVDS display
Hi! I could not find any issues besides double of_node_put in 11/. It is currently being tested: https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-kernel/linux-cip/-/pipelines/169687006 If noone objects (and tests p
Hi! I could not find any issues besides double of_node_put in 11/. It is currently being tested: https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-kernel/linux-cip/-/pipelines/169687006 If noone objects (and tests p
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #4979
·
|
|
[PATCH 4.19.y-cip 11/17] drm: of: Add drm_of_lvds_get_dual_link_pixel_order
Hi! There is double-free bug here, AFAICT: You have put remote_port here. And again here. Now... it is only a problem in error path, so maybe easiest way is to fix it in the mainline and then backport
Hi! There is double-free bug here, AFAICT: You have put remote_port here. And again here. Now... it is only a problem in error path, so maybe easiest way is to fix it in the mainline and then backport
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #4978
·
|
|
[PATCH 4.19.y-cip 2/2] arm64: defconfig: Enable additional support for Renesas platforms
Hi! I see it is already pushed, thank you! Biju, the first patch seems like a bugfix suitable for -stable. Can you send it to Greg (etc) for inclusion? Best regards, Pavel
Hi! I see it is already pushed, thank you! Biju, the first patch seems like a bugfix suitable for -stable. Can you send it to Greg (etc) for inclusion? Best regards, Pavel
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #4951
·
|
|
[PATCH 4.19.y-cip 2/2] arm64: defconfig: Enable additional support for Renesas platforms
Ok, I can apply this if there are no comments. Should we have some updates for cip-kernel-config? Best regards, Pavel
Ok, I can apply this if there are no comments. Should we have some updates for cip-kernel-config? Best regards, Pavel
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #4941
·
|
|
[PATCH 4.19.y-cip 1/2] ASoC: rsnd: fixup SSI clock during suspend/resume modes
Hi! Ok, this is "interesting". It has something to do with rsnd_dai_call() macro. You really should not be programming drivers in preprocessor like this. OTOH patch is simple enough, and only affects
Hi! Ok, this is "interesting". It has something to do with rsnd_dai_call() macro. You really should not be programming drivers in preprocessor like this. OTOH patch is simple enough, and only affects
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #4940
·
|
|
[PATCH 4.4.y-cip] serial: sh-sci: Make sure status register SCxSR is read in correct sequence
Hi! It looks good to me, and it passed basic testing -- so I applied the patch and am pushing it. (I hope you don't mind). Best regards, Pavel
Hi! It looks good to me, and it passed basic testing -- so I applied the patch and am pushing it. (I hope you don't mind). Best regards, Pavel
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #4937
·
|
|
[PATCH 4.4.y-cip] serial: sh-sci: Make sure status register SCxSR is read in correct sequence
Hi! Looks good to me. I notice this applies cleanly to v4.4-stable. Was this submitted to 4.4 / do you need some help there? Does this have user-visible impact? Best regards, Pavel
Hi! Looks good to me. I notice this applies cleanly to v4.4-stable. Was this submitted to 4.4 / do you need some help there? Does this have user-visible impact? Best regards, Pavel
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #4935
·
|
|
Notes from realtime meeting, questions for companies using realtime
Hi! This week I attended virtual RT meeting, and have couple of notes, and couple of questions. Intel was biggest sponsor of RT, and they are decreasing their funding. So RT project is looking for ...
Hi! This week I attended virtual RT meeting, and have couple of notes, and couple of questions. Intel was biggest sponsor of RT, and they are decreasing their funding. So RT project is looking for ...
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #4934
·
|
|
[ANNOUNCE] v4.19.132-cip30-rt12
Hi! v4.19.132-cip30-rt12 should be available at kernel.org. Trees are available at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/linux-cip.git/log/?h=linux-4.19.y-cip-rt https://git.kernel.org/p
Hi! v4.19.132-cip30-rt12 should be available at kernel.org. Trees are available at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/linux-cip.git/log/?h=linux-4.19.y-cip-rt https://git.kernel.org/p
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #4928
·
|
|
[PATCH 4.4.y-cip 06/23] PM / OPP: Manage device clk
Hi! Strange. Same code exists in mainline (drivers/opp/core.c, function name changed to _allocate_opp_table), and ret is directly overwritten there. That's definitely not usual way of handling -EPROBE
Hi! Strange. Same code exists in mainline (drivers/opp/core.c, function name changed to _allocate_opp_table), and ret is directly overwritten there. That's definitely not usual way of handling -EPROBE
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #4927
·
|
|
[PATCH 4.4.y-cip 06/23] PM / OPP: Manage device clk
Hi! Can you double check this piece? In case of clk_get() returning EPROBE_DEFER, I'd expect this code to return it to the callers, without continuing initialization. Best regards, Pavel
Hi! Can you double check this piece? In case of clk_get() returning EPROBE_DEFER, I'd expect this code to return it to the callers, without continuing initialization. Best regards, Pavel
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #4926
·
|
|
[PATCH 4.4.y-cip 22/23] PM / OPP: Remove useless check
Hi! So we have 2/ of the series, fixed by 18/ of the series, but 18/ is buggy too, fixed by 22/. It would be good to have them close ... or possibly merged or dropped. Thank you, Pavel
Hi! So we have 2/ of the series, fixed by 18/ of the series, but 18/ is buggy too, fixed by 22/. It would be good to have them close ... or possibly merged or dropped. Thank you, Pavel
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #4925
·
|
|
[PATCH 4.4.y-cip 18/23] PM / OPP: Initialize regulator pointer to an error value
Again, this should be close to (or merged with) patch 2/ of the series. Best regards, Pavel
Again, this should be close to (or merged with) patch 2/ of the series. Best regards, Pavel
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #4924
·
|
|
[PATCH 4.4.y-cip 17/23] PM / OPP: Fix NULL pointer dereference crash when disabling OPPs
Hi! So this one should be close to the patch it fixes, or maybe squashed together. Best regards, Pavel
Hi! So this one should be close to the patch it fixes, or maybe squashed together. Best regards, Pavel
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #4923
·
|
|
[PATCH 4.4.y-cip 00/23] PM / OPP v2 & cpufreq backports part 2
Hi! Ok, I went through them, and most of them are ok. OTOH lots of them are changing common code, and I don't believe all of them are neccessary for am33xx support. Could you identify changes that are
Hi! Ok, I went through them, and most of them are ok. OTOH lots of them are changing common code, and I don't believe all of them are neccessary for am33xx support. Could you identify changes that are
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #4922
·
|
|
v4.19-rt status
Hi! And Tom said he expects new release this Monday. With new -cip kernel released, that should be good timing. Best regards, Pavel
Hi! And Tom said he expects new release this Monday. With new -cip kernel released, that should be good timing. Best regards, Pavel
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #4921
·
|
|
v4.19-rt status
Hi! Still no new -rt release. In April, Tom Zanussi took over 4.19-rt releases: Apr 20 Linux 4.19.115-rt49 Apr 28 Linux 4.19.115-rt50 May 3 Linux 4.19.116-rt51 May 4 Linux 4.19.120-rt52 May 20 Linux 4
Hi! Still no new -rt release. In April, Tom Zanussi took over 4.19-rt releases: Apr 20 Linux 4.19.115-rt49 Apr 28 Linux 4.19.115-rt50 May 3 Linux 4.19.116-rt51 May 4 Linux 4.19.120-rt52 May 20 Linux 4
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #4917
·
|