|
A bit of housekeeping
Hi all, I appreciate that this project is just getting started, so please just take the following as gentle nagging: - https://www.cip-project.org/news does not appear to be working. I'm aware of at l
Hi all, I appreciate that this project is just getting started, so please just take the following as gentle nagging: - https://www.cip-project.org/news does not appear to be working. I'm aware of at l
|
By
Paul Sherwood
· #5
·
|
|
CIP Endeavour decision
Matthias, I only came across your email from June [1] today, which is sad, because if I had seen it earlier I would have encouraged others to reply to your reasonable questions. I'm quoting your origi
Matthias, I only came across your email from June [1] today, which is sad, because if I had seen it earlier I would have encouraged others to reply to your reasonable questions. I'm quoting your origi
|
By
Paul Sherwood
· #8
·
|
|
Use cases behind CIP story
I'd personally prefer to see the discussion start on this list, rather than blog posts, since that way people can question, comment and discuss. I'd recommend that blog posts can distill from and summ
I'd personally prefer to see the discussion start on this list, rather than blog posts, since that way people can question, comment and discuss. I'd recommend that blog posts can distill from and summ
|
By
Paul Sherwood
· #18
·
|
|
Introduction
To introduce myself, I'm CEO at Codethink, but to the best of my ability I'll be commenting here from a personal perspective, independent of Codethink's official involvement in CIP. To start the ball
To introduce myself, I'm CEO at Codethink, but to the best of my ability I'll be commenting here from a personal perspective, independent of Codethink's official involvement in CIP. To start the ball
|
By
Paul Sherwood
· #19
·
|
|
Introduction
On 2016-09-15 17:17, Paul Sherwood wrote: <snip> > Just yesterday there was a very interesting post about backports and > long term stable kernels on LWN [2]. Greg is quoted there > considering: Oops
On 2016-09-15 17:17, Paul Sherwood wrote: <snip> > Just yesterday there was a very interesting post about backports and > long term stable kernels on LWN [2]. Greg is quoted there > considering: Oops
|
By
Paul Sherwood
· #20
·
|
|
Introduction
I expect there are multiple usecases/scenarios and a one-size-fits-all approach may not be possible. But note that even with six month cycle and periodic patch releases, it seems to me you imply requi
I expect there are multiple usecases/scenarios and a one-size-fits-all approach may not be possible. But note that even with six month cycle and periodic patch releases, it seems to me you imply requi
|
By
Paul Sherwood
· #26
·
|
|
New IRC channel for
#cip
This is a problem for many companies, actually, but I hope we can still encourage people to participate in IRC, mainly because there are so many established FOSS projects and contributors actively usi
This is a problem for many companies, actually, but I hope we can still encourage people to participate in IRC, mainly because there are so many established FOSS projects and contributors actively usi
|
By
Paul Sherwood
· #44
·
|
|
[SystemSafety] Critical systems Linux
While systemsafety may be the leading community for public discussion around systems (and software) safety, it is not the only ML that has an interest in this topic so I'm cross-posting to some other
While systemsafety may be the leading community for public discussion around systems (and software) safety, it is not the only ML that has an interest in this topic so I'm cross-posting to some other
|
By
Paul Sherwood
· #1664
·
|
|
[SystemSafety] Critical systems Linux
Now to attempt to answer the question... Some initiatives have already started down this road, for example SIL2LINUXMP (in cc) But my personal perspective is 1) it may be the the certifications themse
Now to attempt to answer the question... Some initiatives have already started down this road, for example SIL2LINUXMP (in cc) But my personal perspective is 1) it may be the the certifications themse
|
By
Paul Sherwood
· #1665
·
|
|
[SystemSafety] Critical systems Linux
Hi again... Sadly most of the followon discussion seems to have stayed only on systemsafetylist.org [1] which rather reduces its impact IMO. I cross-posted in the hope that knowledge from the safety c
Hi again... Sadly most of the followon discussion seems to have stayed only on systemsafetylist.org [1] which rather reduces its impact IMO. I cross-posted in the hope that knowledge from the safety c
|
By
Paul Sherwood
· #1669
·
|
|
[C-safe-secure-studygroup] [SystemSafety] Critical systems Linux
Hi Clive, this is very helpful, thank you. I'm going to re-add the other lists, for the same reason as before, and hope you're ok with that. Please see my comments inline below... Understood, and I'd
Hi Clive, this is very helpful, thank you. I'm going to re-add the other lists, for the same reason as before, and hope you're ok with that. Please see my comments inline below... Understood, and I'd
|
By
Paul Sherwood
· #1671
·
|
|
Snapshot release of B@D
Robert Thank you for all of your contributions over recent years at Codethink- it's been a pleasure working with you. You will be missed.
Robert Thank you for all of your contributions over recent years at Codethink- it's been a pleasure working with you. You will be missed.
|
By
Paul Sherwood
· #1681
·
|