Hi! Ok, so first patch adds support for using "delayed" DHCP replies, then there are three more patches to fix up issues it creates. Which tells me that maybe this is not quite suitable for -stable. H

Thanks, I applied the series.

I prefer directly including good commit (rather than including bad commit and then fixing it up). Let me try to fix it up. Anyway, I merged this and the rest of the series.

Thanks, applied.

This one rejected when I tried applying it. Pavel -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

This fails for me, because arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a774c0.dtsi does not yet exist.

This does not apply. -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

Hi! I could not apply this, as arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a774c0.dtsi does not exist in my tree. Plus, you are pushing spdx comment changes. I guess it is ok if it makes your life easier, but...

I could not apply this on c312fd1d432e36f9012127fe3c1d2b7023afae48-based tree. I have struct sh_pfc_pin_group common[117]; while the patch expects struct sh_pfc_pin_group common[123];

This does not apply. My kernel still has: while this expects... way higher number. I tried to look at pending patches in patchwork, that maybe if I tried to apply everything it would work, but could n

Thank you! But I don't see anything new at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/linux-cip.git/ . Did you forget to push or is it still processing? Best regards, Pavel

Applied the series. Thanks!

Thanks, I applied the series. Pavel

Thanks, I applied the series. Pavel

Thanks, I applied the series. Pavel

Thanks, I applied the series.

Thanks, I applied the series. Strictly speaking patches 1, 4, 16 only alter whitespace, so they would not be welcome under -stable rules. OTOH they clearly do not break anything, and ammount of surrou

Hi! Good news -- I believe we managed to sort it out. Tree at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/linux-cip.git/log/?h=linux-4.19.y-cip should now be up-to-date with your patches. If y

Hi! Let me take a look. I'll apply them to the tree if there's no problem with them...? Best regards, Pavel

Hi! I'd really use temporary variable here. Something like if (IS_ERR()) { err = PTR_ERR(); if (err != -ENOENT) return err; priv->clks[1] = NULL; } But this is -cip, so no need to fix it here, but con