|
New CVE entries in this week
Hi! Furthermore, CIP members should really not be using code from staging. This one looks rather easy to backport. It failed only because reformatting of the printk. Would it make sense to ask why it
Hi! Furthermore, CIP members should really not be using code from staging. This one looks rather easy to backport. It failed only because reformatting of the printk. Would it make sense to ask why it
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #6876
·
|
|
CIP IRC weekly meeting today on libera.chat
Hi! I'm sorry. Warning was clear, but I did not open the email... I was reviewing patches for 5.10.77. Best regards, Pavel
Hi! I'm sorry. Warning was clear, but I did not open the email... I was reviewing patches for 5.10.77. Best regards, Pavel
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #6862
·
|
|
New CVE Entries in this week
Hi! This seems to be fixed in stable/4.4, too, as 61a811e8f5229264b822361f8b23d7638fd8c914. And cip-kernel-sec says so, good. AFAICT the vulnerability was introduced by 1ef6f7c9390f in 5.9-rc3. But th
Hi! This seems to be fixed in stable/4.4, too, as 61a811e8f5229264b822361f8b23d7638fd8c914. And cip-kernel-sec says so, good. AFAICT the vulnerability was introduced by 1ef6f7c9390f in 5.9-rc3. But th
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #6860
·
|
|
CIP IRC weekly meeting today on libera.chat
Hi! Sorry, I missed the meeting. There are public holidays today, and I'm quite busy this week. From last irc meeting, I was reviewing 5.10.76. Best regards, Pavel
Hi! Sorry, I missed the meeting. There are public holidays today, and I'm quite busy this week. From last irc meeting, I was reviewing 5.10.76. Best regards, Pavel
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #6848
·
|
|
New CVE entry this week
Hi! Others are fixed, but this one may be worth watching. Fortunately it is not remote attack, AFAICT. Best regards, Pavel
Hi! Others are fixed, but this one may be worth watching. Fortunately it is not remote attack, AFAICT. Best regards, Pavel
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #6824
·
|
|
New CVE entry this week
Hi! ... I guess we can wait for this to be merged through normal channels. It may make sense to help with this backport. Not sure why this has CVE number. We probably need not care. I guess we don't c
Hi! ... I guess we can wait for this to be merged through normal channels. It may make sense to help with this backport. Not sure why this has CVE number. We probably need not care. I guess we don't c
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #6802
·
|
|
Prompt timeouts on ipc227e board -- randomness related?
Hi! Thank you, but that board seems to still have problems: https://lava.ciplatform.org/scheduler/job/458108 expect-shell-connection: Wait for prompt ['root@ebsy-isar:~#'] (timeout 00:10:00) Waiting u
Hi! Thank you, but that board seems to still have problems: https://lava.ciplatform.org/scheduler/job/458108 expect-shell-connection: Wait for prompt ['root@ebsy-isar:~#'] (timeout 00:10:00) Waiting u
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #6791
·
|
|
[ANNOUNCE] v4.4.285-cip63-rt36 (-rt226)
Hi! New realtime trees should be available at kernel.org. Trees are available at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/linux-cip.git/log/?h=linux-4.4.y-cip-rt https://git.kernel.org/pub/
Hi! New realtime trees should be available at kernel.org. Trees are available at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/linux-cip.git/log/?h=linux-4.4.y-cip-rt https://git.kernel.org/pub/
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #6776
·
|
|
Could we get 4.4.285-cip release? ([ANNOUNCE] 4.4.285-rt226 (fwd))
Hi! 4.4.285-rt226 is out it would be good to make it into -cip-rt release. Would it be possible to create 4.4.285-cip release to make it easier? Thanks and best regards, Pavel ----- Forwarded message
Hi! 4.4.285-rt226 is out it would be good to make it into -cip-rt release. Would it be possible to create 4.4.285-cip release to make it easier? Thanks and best regards, Pavel ----- Forwarded message
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #6768
·
|
|
Commonly used bluetooth/wifi drivers
Hi! On cip-members, there was question of widely used drivers that we should include for WIFI or Bluetooth. AFAICT there are no standartized interfaces for WIFI, and each vendor has their own. For Blu
Hi! On cip-members, there was question of widely used drivers that we should include for WIFI or Bluetooth. AFAICT there are no standartized interfaces for WIFI, and each vendor has their own. For Blu
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #6767
·
|
|
Quality of wireless drivers (rtl8821ae, ath10k, wl18xx)
Hi! On cip-members there's discussion about quality of selected wireless drivers. AFAICT we are reviewing changes to those drivers on -stable series (good). We are not testing the drivers in any meani
Hi! On cip-members there's discussion about quality of selected wireless drivers. AFAICT we are reviewing changes to those drivers on -stable series (good). We are not testing the drivers in any meani
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #6761
·
|
|
Coordinating stable reviews
Hi! I guess I should mention alternate possibilities. We could try to somehow "hash" the commits... Perhaps I'd review all the patches where upstream sha begins with 0-6. But patches in -stable often
Hi! I guess I should mention alternate possibilities. We could try to somehow "hash" the commits... Perhaps I'd review all the patches where upstream sha begins with 0-6. But patches in -stable often
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #6752
·
|
|
Coordinating stable reviews
Hi! It is good to review "stable" patches soon, because such reviews are more useful for the stable community, and because when bug is spotted, it is easier to get patch dropped in the 5.10.X-rc phase
Hi! It is good to review "stable" patches soon, because such reviews are more useful for the stable community, and because when bug is spotted, it is easier to get patch dropped in the 5.10.X-rc phase
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #6751
·
|
|
Prompt timeouts on ipc227e board -- randomness related?
Hi! It is not first time I see this failure: https://lava.ciplatform.org/scheduler/job/444336 [[0;32m OK [0m] Started Login Service. [[0m[0;31m* [0m] (1 of 2) A start job is running for…ate sshd host
Hi! It is not first time I see this failure: https://lava.ciplatform.org/scheduler/job/444336 [[0;32m OK [0m] Started Login Service. [[0m[0;31m* [0m] (1 of 2) A start job is running for…ate sshd host
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #6749
·
|
|
Travels & IRC meeting tommorow
Hi! I'm travelling tommorow and day after that, so I may not make it to the irc meeting. I have reviewed patches for 5.10.64, 65 and 66. Best regards, Pavel -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing
Hi! I'm travelling tommorow and day after that, so I may not make it to the irc meeting. I have reviewed patches for 5.10.64, 65 and 66. Best regards, Pavel -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #6738
·
|
|
[ANNOUNCE] v4.19.206-cip57-rt22 (-rt87)
Hi! New realtime trees should be available at kernel.org. Trees are available at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/linux-cip.git/log/?h=linux-4.19.y-cip-rt https://git.kernel.org/pub
Hi! New realtime trees should be available at kernel.org. Trees are available at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/linux-cip.git/log/?h=linux-4.19.y-cip-rt https://git.kernel.org/pub
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #6733
·
|
|
New CVE entry this week
Hi! I don't think we need to care about this one. Embedded systems don't usually run untrusted code... This is already queued to 4.4 and 4.19; we can simply wait. KVM. Tricky code and not exactly focu
Hi! I don't think we need to care about this one. Embedded systems don't usually run untrusted code... This is already queued to 4.4 and 4.19; we can simply wait. KVM. Tricky code and not exactly focu
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #6720
·
|
|
New CVE entry this week
Hi! These summaries are not so short; I simply skip them and go to full list. Perhaps they don't need to be included, or could include only CVEs where we need to take an action? This one is queued for
Hi! These summaries are not so short; I simply skip them and go to full list. Perhaps they don't need to be included, or could include only CVEs where we need to take an action? This one is queued for
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #6715
·
|
|
New CVE entries this week
Hi! Hmm, no; that is what original code did and what is known not to work for reasons I don't fully understand. Anyway, I asked on the lists, and according to Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo Ubuntu did
Hi! Hmm, no; that is what original code did and what is known not to work for reasons I don't fully understand. Anyway, I asked on the lists, and according to Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo Ubuntu did
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #6707
·
|
|
New CVE entries this week
Hi! At least some of the relevant fixes are queued for 5.10.61/4.19. Likely this will resolve itself. I took a look into this. Apparently 4.14 and 4.19 is affected. ( https://seclists.org/oss-sec/2021
Hi! At least some of the relevant fixes are queued for 5.10.61/4.19. Likely this will resolve itself. I took a look into this. Apparently 4.14 and 4.19 is affected. ( https://seclists.org/oss-sec/2021
|
By
Pavel Machek
· #6706
·
|