Thanks for the reviews! I'll drop all of those then. It's also a fix for a tiny bug in its own right. CU Uli

Hi! a | d2d3052d9 6f8ecb o+ | gpio: vf610: connect GPIO label to dev name a | 09fa241bc 4971c2 o+ | ima: Align ima_file_mmap() parameters with mmap_file LSM hook a | 38345d84e aa56b9 o | dm flakey: fi

Hi! Here are the manual backports for the upcoming 4.4-st39, 4.4-cip74 and 4.4-cip74-rt43 releases that should be reviewed, and that can currently be found in https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kern

Hi ! It's this week's CVE report. This week reported 12 new CVEs and 0 updated CVEs. * New CVEs CVE-2022-4744: tun: avoid double free in tun_free_netdev CVSS v3 score is not provided. A double free bu

Hi, Thanks for your patch.

Hi, Thanks for your patch!

Hi,

cip/linux-4.4.y-st-rc ltp-ipc: 6 runs, 1 regressions (v4.4-st20-1097-gd51b0e04681f) Regressions Summary ------------------- platform | arch | lab | compiler | defconfig | regressions -----------------

#kernelci

cip/linux-4.4.y-st-rc ltp-fcntl-locktests: 3 runs, 1 regressions (v4.4-st20-1097-gd51b0e04681f) Regressions Summary ------------------- platform | arch | lab | compiler | defconfig | regressions -----

#kernelci

cip/linux-4.4.y-st-rc kselftest-futex: 5 runs, 1 regressions (v4.4-st20-1097-gd51b0e04681f) Regressions Summary ------------------- platform | arch | lab | compiler | defconfig | regressions ---------

#kernelci

cip/linux-4.4.y-st-rc baseline-nfs: 24 runs, 2 regressions (v4.4-st20-1097-gd51b0e04681f) Regressions Summary ------------------- platform | arch | lab | compiler | defconfig | regressions -----------

#kernelci

cip/linux-4.4.y-st-rc build: 177 builds: 4 failed, 173 passed, 4 errors, 38 warnings (v4.4-st20-1097-gd51b0e04681f) Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/cip/branch/linux-4.4.y-st-rc/kernel/v

#kernelci

From: Srinuvasan A <srinuvasan.a@...> Let us try and make sure that all bits we have are executed as expected. Signed-off-by: Srinuvasan A <srinuvasan.a@...> --- recipes-core/home-fs/f

Another idea is I could send this patch as a static checker fix instead of a security vulnerability. That way we would be safe going forward regardless. regards, dan carpenter

Did we ever figure out if it's possible for nfit_mem to be NULL? regards, dan carpenter

Hi Dinesh, [...] This is fine :) Kind regards, Chris

From: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@...> In ALSA control interface, applications can execute two types of request for value of members on each element; ELEM_READ and ELEM_WRITE. In ALSA contro

From: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...> commit 5a23699a39abc5328921a81b89383d088f6ba9cc upstream. The patch "ALSA: control: code refactoring for ELEM_READ/ELEM_WRITE operations" introduced

From: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@...> ALSA control core handles ELEM_READ/ELEM_WRITE requests within lock acquisition of a counting semaphore. The lock is acquired in helper functions in th