|
RT Testing
Hi Chris, Just thinking out loud below so please bear with me if I'm just stating the obvious. Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...> writes: I think CIP-core shouldn't be thought of as a comple
Hi Chris, Just thinking out loud below so please bear with me if I'm just stating the obvious. Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...> writes: I think CIP-core shouldn't be thought of as a comple
|
By
punit1.agrawal@...
· #4185
·
|
|
RT Testing
Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...> writes: Apologies for the confusion - I was referring to the inline comments further down in the previous mail. [...]
Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...> writes: Apologies for the confusion - I was referring to the inline comments further down in the previous mail. [...]
|
By
punit1.agrawal@...
· #4196
·
|
|
RESUME REQUEST: [cip-core] Package Proposal #1 (Security packages)
Hello Yoshida-san, Kento Yoshida <kento.yoshida.wz@...> writes: I have a comment about packages in the proposal that depend on hardware / system features - * Some packages in the proposal depe
Hello Yoshida-san, Kento Yoshida <kento.yoshida.wz@...> writes: I have a comment about packages in the proposal that depend on hardware / system features - * Some packages in the proposal depe
|
By
punit1.agrawal@...
· #4198
·
|
|
RESUME REQUEST: [cip-core] Package Proposal #1 (Security packages)
Thank you for your comments, Yoshida-san. Follow up comments inline. Kento Yoshida <kento.yoshida.wz@...> writes: Agreed. But without an explicit statement of the requirement, how can a hardwa
Thank you for your comments, Yoshida-san. Follow up comments inline. Kento Yoshida <kento.yoshida.wz@...> writes: Agreed. But without an explicit statement of the requirement, how can a hardwa
|
By
punit1.agrawal@...
· #4207
·
|
|
Package Proposal #1 (Security packages), rev03
Hi, As mentioned earlier, I had some questions / queries regarding the requirements for the proposed packages. Sending them here for discussion. Kento Yoshida <kento.yoshida.wz@...> writes: *
Hi, As mentioned earlier, I had some questions / queries regarding the requirements for the proposed packages. Sending them here for discussion. Kento Yoshida <kento.yoshida.wz@...> writes: *
|
By
punit1.agrawal@...
· #4484
·
|
|
Package Proposal #1 (Security packages), rev03
Hi Yoshida-san, Thanks for the clarifications. Where applicable please include them in the requirements text and / or comments for the relevant packages for the next update. One additional comment bel
Hi Yoshida-san, Thanks for the clarifications. Where applicable please include them in the requirements text and / or comments for the relevant packages for the next update. One additional comment bel
|
By
punit1.agrawal@...
· #4496
·
|
|
Backporting "net: ipv6_stub: use ip6_dst_lookup_flow instead of ip6_dst_lookup"
Hi Pavel, Not sure if the email was intended for any specific recipient so my comments below may not make sense... Pavel Machek <pavel@...> writes: It would be helpful for readers / reviewers if th
Hi Pavel, Not sure if the email was intended for any specific recipient so my comments below may not make sense... Pavel Machek <pavel@...> writes: It would be helpful for readers / reviewers if th
|
By
punit1.agrawal@...
· #4500
·
|
|
[PATCH 4.4] vhost: Check docket sk_family instead of call getname
Hi Pavel, A couple of comments below - Pavel Machek <pavel@...> writes: Please follow the style guidelines documented in Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst. In this instance, please ment
Hi Pavel, A couple of comments below - Pavel Machek <pavel@...> writes: Please follow the style guidelines documented in Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst. In this instance, please ment
|
By
punit1.agrawal@...
· #4540
·
|
|
Python 3.x vs 2.7
Hi Kent, Kento Yoshida <kento.yoshida.wz@...> writes: [...] From a brief look at the pros / cons between the two choices (below), I am also biased towards backporting a python3 based version o
Hi Kent, Kento Yoshida <kento.yoshida.wz@...> writes: [...] From a brief look at the pros / cons between the two choices (below), I am also biased towards backporting a python3 based version o
|
By
punit1.agrawal@...
· #4552
·
|
|
Migration complete - Re: Mailman2 to Groups.io reminder
Pavel Machek <pavel@...> writes: I wonder if it's possible to turn these off by the admin. Also, another thing to test is the impact of the footer on applying patches sent via email (git am / git a
Pavel Machek <pavel@...> writes: I wonder if it's possible to turn these off by the admin. Also, another thing to test is the impact of the footer on applying patches sent via email (git am / git a
|
By
punit1.agrawal@...
· #4557
·
|
|
CIP Core target EOL dates
Hi, CIP is planning to support the Kernels + Debian Rootfs combinations marked with 'x' in the table below. +----------+----------+-----------+-----------+ | | Debian 8 | Debian 9 | Debian 10 | | | Je
Hi, CIP is planning to support the Kernels + Debian Rootfs combinations marked with 'x' in the table below. +----------+----------+-----------+-----------+ | | Debian 8 | Debian 9 | Debian 10 | | | Je
|
By
punit1.agrawal@...
· #4569
·
|
|
CIP Core target EOL dates
Hello Kudo-san, Thanks for your comments. "masashi.kudo@..." <masashi.kudo@...> writes: For the calculation, I used the upstream kernel release date as reference but we can u
Hello Kudo-san, Thanks for your comments. "masashi.kudo@..." <masashi.kudo@...> writes: For the calculation, I used the upstream kernel release date as reference but we can u
|
By
punit1.agrawal@...
· #4573
·
|
|
CIP Core target EOL dates
Hi Kudo-san, "masashi.kudo@..." <masashi.kudo@...> writes: I definitely went through it a couple of times and still made an obvious mistake. Thanks for re-calculating and che
Hi Kudo-san, "masashi.kudo@..." <masashi.kudo@...> writes: I definitely went through it a couple of times and still made an obvious mistake. Thanks for re-calculating and che
|
By
punit1.agrawal@...
· #4575
·
|
|
CIP IRC weekly meeting today
Hi Kudo-san, I won't be able to attend the meeting today. Some updates below - "masashi.kudo@..." <masashi.kudo@...> writes: [...] - Discussion around projected EOL for CIP c
Hi Kudo-san, I won't be able to attend the meeting today. Some updates below - "masashi.kudo@..." <masashi.kudo@...> writes: [...] - Discussion around projected EOL for CIP c
|
By
punit1.agrawal@...
· #4579
·
|