Hi! These look good to me: a | 998080b96 c77065 o+ | i2c: omap: Fix standard mode false ACK readings a | 911c66cfc 8ee3b0 .+ | drm/rockchip: Drop unbalanced obj unref a | 6378f4810 40882d o+ | NFSv4.1

Hi! Patches look ok to me. I can apply them if they pass testing and if there are no other comments. Best regards, Pavel

Hi! So we discussed options on todays meeting on IRC (you may want to review the log)... and if you are willing to do the work, we are willing to consider option 2. That does not mean we are willing t

Hi! They look good to me, too. Reviewed-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@...> Best regards, Pavel

Hi! Minor details I noticed during review (they should not prevent merge): KHz should be kHz. Double space (" "). Normally we'd put macro names in all uppercase. ... Is it possible that bit_clrl(priv-

Hi! This is the preferred option. Thanks and best regards, Pavel

Hi! I'll need to look at the commit more carefuly. However previous patch redefines pm_ptr macro, which may have implications elsewhere. And indeed commit 5ef11c56b2332613cacd5e7ac17cfb1a073b66ab r816

Hi! New realtime trees should be available at kernel.org. Trees are available at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/linux-cip.git/log/?h=linux-4.19.y-cip-rt https://git.kernel.org/pub

Hi! Now applied. Best regards, Pavel

Hi! Thank you for the patches. Let's start with first 11 -- WDC changes. They passed testing and I can apply them if there are no other comments. Best regards, Pavel

Hi! I'll have comments on 19/, but this one is kind of important: Changing interfaces / deprecating macros is not good thing to do in -cip kernel. How sure are we this will not cause build failures or

Hi! Fun... Let me take a look. It would have been good to bring it up on the IRC meeting, but I forgot. So AFAICT there are three possibilities: 1) Say we can't / don't want to merge the counter drive

Hi! New realtime trees should be available at kernel.org. Trees are available at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/linux-cip.git/log/?h=linux-5.10.y-cip-rt https://git.kernel.org/pub

Hi! I attempted to test 5.10-cip-rt candidate, and something is not right there: Waiting for pod gitlab/runner-gmpa8j7y-project-2678032-concurrent-4vpl2c to be running, status is Pending 13 Containers

Hi! Patches passed my review, too, and they pass testing, so I added your reviewed-by tag and applied the series. Best regards, Pavel

Hi! I'd put it reset_control_assert() after the for () loop freeing the channels, to be symetrical with the init order. AFAICT dma_async_device_unregister(&dmac->engine); of_dma_controller_free(pdev->

Hi! Series looks okay to me, I can apply it if there are no other comments and if it passes testing. Best regards, Pavel

Hi! Seems okay to me. We'll need to apply similar changes to 6.1. If we have ext4, do we need ext2 and ext3? IIRC ext4 can serve as both of those. Best regards, Pavel

Hi! Looks good to me, but likely we should do similar changes for 6.1. Best regards, Pavel

Hi! That's an accident. Intention was to delete localversion-st when merging it to -cip. Best regards, Pavel