|
Reported 4.4.y-st issue from Flamefire
#cip
Hello kernel team, An has been reported an issue with 4.4.y-st on IRC. Forwarding it here so all can see. <quote> Hi guys. I can't make it to the meeting(s) but wanted to let you know that a recent co
Hello kernel team, An has been reported an issue with 4.4.y-st on IRC. Forwarding it here so all can see. <quote> Hi guys. I can't make it to the meeting(s) but wanted to let you know that a recent co
|
By
Chris Paterson
· #8345
·
|
|
CIP IRC weekly meeting today on libera.chat
Hello Jan, Please accept my apologies for today's meeting. I am on leave today. No major updates from me. Kind regards, Chris
Hello Jan, Please accept my apologies for today's meeting. I am on leave today. No major updates from me. Kind regards, Chris
|
By
Chris Paterson
· #8325
·
|
|
gitlab quotas and linux-stable-rc
[...] Done. I've put you on CC. Kind regards, Chris
[...] Done. I've put you on CC. Kind regards, Chris
|
By
Chris Paterson
· #8183
·
|
|
gitlab quotas and linux-stable-rc
Hello Jan, To be honest I thought I had already deleted the project. I've tried again today and it seems to have gone. Hopefully GitLab's storage calculations will catch up soon. Thank you for reporti
Hello Jan, To be honest I thought I had already deleted the project. I've tried again today and it seems to have gone. Hopefully GitLab's storage calculations will catch up soon. Thank you for reporti
|
By
Chris Paterson
· #8174
·
|
|
cip runner offline?
Hello Jan, Not planned, but user (me) error when trying to get the LAVA master back online this morning. Michael is already working to bring the runner back online. I meant to email the ML but forgot,
Hello Jan, Not planned, but user (me) error when trying to get the LAVA master back online this morning. Michael is already working to bring the runner back online. I meant to email the ML but forgot,
|
By
Chris Paterson
· #8029
·
|
|
5.10.110-rc2 mirroring/testing
Hi Pavel, Today I've implemented a new triggering method for our stable-rc testing. Originally we had a linux-stable-rc mirror that sent a webhook/trigger to linux-stable-rc-ci when there was an updat
Hi Pavel, Today I've implemented a new triggering method for our stable-rc testing. Originally we had a linux-stable-rc mirror that sent a webhook/trigger to linux-stable-rc-ci when there was an updat
|
By
Chris Paterson
· #8025
·
|
|
5.10.110-rc2 mirroring/testing
Hello, I've gone through and deleted all the tags/branches we don't care about but GitLab hasn’t updated their storage calculations yet. For now we'll have to wait until they recalculate. Hopefully th
Hello, I've gone through and deleted all the tags/branches we don't care about but GitLab hasn’t updated their storage calculations yet. For now we'll have to wait until they recalculate. Hopefully th
|
By
Chris Paterson
· #8021
·
|
|
5.10.110-rc2 mirroring/testing
Hello Pavel, As Jan hinted, the mirroring has stopped because the linux-stable-rc repository has now gone over the 10GB size limit. I guess we could remove all the branches/tags we don't care about, t
Hello Pavel, As Jan hinted, the mirroring has stopped because the linux-stable-rc repository has now gone over the 10GB size limit. I guess we could remove all the branches/tags we don't care about, t
|
By
Chris Paterson
· #8019
·
|
|
Disabling XEN in our configs (used by QEMU and Renesas)
Hello Pavel, The renesas_defconfig is largely copied from the upstream arm64 defconfig, and upstream renesas_defconfig [0] used for development. As both of the above have CONFIG_XEN=y, we do in CIP's
Hello Pavel, The renesas_defconfig is largely copied from the upstream arm64 defconfig, and upstream renesas_defconfig [0] used for development. As both of the above have CONFIG_XEN=y, we do in CIP's
|
By
Chris Paterson
· #7776
·
|
|
Boot error on altera board
Hello Pavel, Perhaps it was a random networking error at the lab in question. Looking at https://lava.ciplatform.org/scheduler/device_type/de0-nano-soc most tests seem to be going through now. Kind re
Hello Pavel, Perhaps it was a random networking error at the lab in question. Looking at https://lava.ciplatform.org/scheduler/device_type/de0-nano-soc most tests seem to be going through now. Kind re
|
By
Chris Paterson
· #7724
·
|
|
Adding v4.9.y-rc testing support
Hello, Thank you. All are now building as expected. Kind regards, Chris
Hello, Thank you. All are now building as expected. Kind regards, Chris
|
By
Chris Paterson
· #7689
·
|
|
Adding v4.9.y-rc testing support
Hello Iwamatsu-san, all, I've started to add v4.9.y-rc testing support. Initially the build/test support [0] is identical to our v4.4.y-rc testing [1]. In a test run [2] however, we're seeing three fa
Hello Iwamatsu-san, all, I've started to add v4.9.y-rc testing support. Initially the build/test support [0] is identical to our v4.4.y-rc testing [1]. In a test run [2] however, we're seeing three fa
|
By
Chris Paterson
· #7670
·
|
|
kernelci results for my test branch
Hello Pavel, You can now see KernelCI test results from our RC branches etc. here: https://linux.kernelci.org/job/cip-gitlab/ Kind regards, Chris
Hello Pavel, You can now see KernelCI test results from our RC branches etc. here: https://linux.kernelci.org/job/cip-gitlab/ Kind regards, Chris
|
By
Chris Paterson
· #7634
·
|
|
kernelci results for my test branch
Hello Pavel, FYI the best place to check out results from CIP trees is https://kernelci.ciplatform.org/. (which redirects to CIP specific results from kernelci.org) KernelCI is currently monitoring br
Hello Pavel, FYI the best place to check out results from CIP trees is https://kernelci.ciplatform.org/. (which redirects to CIP specific results from kernelci.org) KernelCI is currently monitoring br
|
By
Chris Paterson
· #7616
·
|
|
4.4.302 is going to be last 4.4 release
So does CIP need to maintain the stable version of RT as well as the non-RT stable kernel? Is this achievable? Regards, Chris
So does CIP need to maintain the stable version of RT as well as the non-RT stable kernel? Is this achievable? Regards, Chris
|
By
Chris Paterson
· #7587
·
|
|
4.4.302 is going to be last 4.4 release
Hello, [...] Didn't CIP commit to maintaining a real-time version of each SLTS for the 10 years? Kind regards, Chris
Hello, [...] Didn't CIP commit to maintaining a real-time version of each SLTS for the 10 years? Kind regards, Chris
|
By
Chris Paterson
· #7580
·
|
|
Preparing a container for kernel compilation using the Debian compiler
Hello Iwamatsu-san, Apologies in taking a while to get to this. I've added some comments to the linux-cip-ci MR. linux-cip-pipelines MR is approved but obviously the first MR needs to be merged first.
Hello Iwamatsu-san, Apologies in taking a while to get to this. I've added some comments to the linux-cip-ci MR. linux-cip-pipelines MR is approved but obviously the first MR needs to be merged first.
|
By
Chris Paterson
· #7570
·
|
|
Scheduled down time for lab-cip-renesas
Hello all, Just a quick note to say that lab-cip-renesas will be offline tomorrow (Wed 26th) for a couple of hours, starting from about 1130 UTC. Kind regards, Chris
Hello all, Just a quick note to say that lab-cip-renesas will be offline tomorrow (Wed 26th) for a couple of hours, starting from about 1130 UTC. Kind regards, Chris
|
By
Chris Paterson
· #7480
·
|
|
5.10.85 breaks CIP testing Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/33] 5.10.86-rc1 review
Note that I've done a quick build test [0] with GCC v11.1.0 and 5.10.y-cip seems to build okay. If anyone wants to do something similar in their tests, edit your .gitlab-ci.yml as in [1]. [0] https://
Note that I've done a quick build test [0] with GCC v11.1.0 and 5.10.y-cip seems to build okay. If anyone wants to do something similar in their tests, edit your .gitlab-ci.yml as in [1]. [0] https://
|
By
Chris Paterson
· #7194
·
|
|
5.10.85 breaks CIP testing Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/33] 5.10.86-rc1 review
Hello, Hi Pavel, sorry for missing this email before now. I can look into supporting this, depending on the answers to the comments below... Well this leads us to an interesting point. At the moment w
Hello, Hi Pavel, sorry for missing this email before now. I can look into supporting this, depending on the answers to the comments below... Well this leads us to an interesting point. At the moment w
|
By
Chris Paterson
· #7193
·
|