Date
1 - 8 of 8
Kernel configurations in the CIP project
|
Lukas Bulwahn <Lukas.Bulwahn@...>
Hi Robert,
If I recall our conversation and follow the discussion on cip-dev correctly, you are still maintaining the test builds and infrastructure from the CIP project, right? Could you provide to Markus Kreidl, Nicholas McGuire (see CC) and me the kernel configurations you use in the test builds for the different CIP members? Background: Markus Kreidl has written a tool that determines which patches, which hunks of those patches are relevant to a given configuration. We would be interested in providing an overview of which patches are especially relevant for the given configs of a new CIP kernel patchlevel release, and hence, the CIP maintainers (hopefully, it is not just Ben) are informed about those and can have a good look at those specific patches when they provide a new kernel release version. If it useful, we would follow-up how to make that fit nicely into the existing review and reporting process. If it not useful, we learned a lesson about our tool. Best regards, Lukas |
|
|
|
Daniel Sangorrin <daniel.sangorrin@...>
Hello Lukas,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-----Original Message-----Not sure about the configs that Robert uses for testing, but the configurations from CIP members can be found here. https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-kernel/cip-kernel-config Background:That sounds very interesting indeed. It would be nice if you could also map the patches to the LTP tests that need to be run. Thanks, Daniel |
|
|
|
Robert Marshall <robert.marshall@...>
Lukas
Thanks for your email, comments below. Lukas Bulwahn <Lukas.Bulwahn@...> writes: Hi Robert,That's correct Could you provide to Markus Kreidl, Nicholas McGuire (see CC) and meI'm using the kernel versions with the latest CIP tag, I use exactly the procedure described on this page https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/civilinfrastructureplatform/cipsystembuildhowto#building-the-cip-kernel-with-kernel-ci building for the beaglebone black and the Renesas iwg20m board. Robert Background:-- Robert Marshall, Software Developer Codethink Ltd Telephone: +44 7762 840 414 3rd Floor, Dale House, 35 Dale Street https://www.codethink.co.uk/ MANCHESTER, M1 2HF. United Kingdom |
|
|
|
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...>
On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 08:33 +0900, Daniel Sangorrin wrote:
Hello Lukas,[...]-----Original Message-----Not sure about the configs that Robert uses for testing, but the configurations from CIP members can be found here. I think these are the configurations that Lukas needs - they are the configurations that should be used for determining whether commits are relevant to CIP. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Software Developer Codethink Ltd https://www.codethink.co.uk/ Dale House, 35 Dale Street Manchester, M1 2HF, United Kingdom |
|
|
|
Lukas Bulwahn <Lukas.Bulwahn@...>
On 2018-10-04, 15:52, "Ben Hutchings" <ben.hutchings@...> wrote:
On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 08:33 +0900, Daniel Sangorrin wrote: > Hello Lukas, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: cip-dev-bounces@... > > Hi Robert, > > > > If I recall our conversation and follow the discussion on cip-dev correctly, you are still > > maintaining the test builds and infrastructure from the CIP project, right? > > > > Could you provide to Markus Kreidl, Nicholas McGuire (see CC) and me the kernel > > configurations you use in the test builds for the different CIP members? > > Not sure about the configs that Robert uses for testing, but the configurations from CIP members can be found here. > https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-kernel/cip-kernel-config [...] I think these are the configurations that Lukas needs - they are the configurations that should be used for determining whether commits are relevant to CIP. Thanks for all the responses. I believe Markus Kreidl is already looking how he can produce useful information for the cip releases and those configs. Lukas |
|
|
|
Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...>
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 02:51:46PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 08:33 +0900, Daniel Sangorrin wrote:ok - we started playing with them the siemens iot config seems very large to me is thatHello Lukas,[...]-----Original Message-----Not sure about the configs that Robert uses for testing, but the configurations from CIP members can be found here. a designed config or did that "happen" ? thx! hofrat |
|
|
|
Jan Kiszka
On 05.10.18 06:10, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 02:51:46PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:The IOT2000 is an open platform, and that naturally brings in the need to have more features preconfigured than one would selected in a dedicated devices, e.g. drivers for pluggable devices.On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 08:33 +0900, Daniel Sangorrin wrote:ok - we started playing with them the siemens iot config seems very large to me is thatHello Lukas,[...]-----Original Message-----Not sure about the configs that Robert uses for testing, but the configurations from CIP members can be found here. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux |
|
|
|
Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...>
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 02:33:32PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 05.10.18 06:10, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:ok - but that makes the evaluation of actual impact quite hardOn Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 02:51:46PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:The IOT2000 is an open platform, and that naturally brings in the need toOn Wed, 2018-10-03 at 08:33 +0900, Daniel Sangorrin wrote:ok - we started playing with them the siemens iot config seems very large to me is thatHello Lukas,[...]-----Original Message-----Not sure about the configs that Robert uses for testing, but the configurations from CIP members can be found here. so it would be very helpful to have a realistic reference example for a particular use-case if that is possible. The current configuration will give a very pesemistic view of the potential impact. Do you know if there is some Use-Case that we could use as a comparison ? thx! hofrat |
|
|