Date
1 - 5 of 5
Linux-cip: Kselftest plans
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...>
On Tue, 2020-03-17 at 13:30 +0530, vijai kumar wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 4:19 AM <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp> wrote:[...] Some self-tests will fail on older kernel versions due to missingI am now implementing LAVA's kselftest. This kselftest uses kseflftest included in the latest kernel.Thank you Nobuhiro-San. Our original idea was to use the kselftest features or bugs that might not be practically fixable. Test cases can report "skip" rather than "fail" for missing features, but this is not done consistently. The way I've used kselftest with stable branches has been to look for regressions rather than any failures. The Linaro folks are doing that (reporting regressions only) when sending test results to the stable list, but I don't know how or how much they have automated that. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Software Developer Codethink Ltd https://www.codethink.co.uk/ Dale House, 35 Dale Street Manchester, M1 2HF, United Kingdom
|
|
Vijai Kumar K
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 4:19 AM <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp> wrote:
Thank you Nobuhiro-San. Our original idea was to use the kselftest from 4.19/4.4 cip tree. We faced some issues with out-of-tree compilation while debianizing it. Also we faced some compilation issues. If that is the case, that we are going to use kselftest from the latest kernel, how can we track the kselftest binaries for a particular cip kernel release? I am not sure if all the test cases would pass for 4.19/4/4. Do you have any plans to maintain a branch and release kselftest binaries and/or testcases that have been tested with a particular cip kernel release? Thanks, Vijai Kumar K Best regards,
|
|
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi all,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
-----Original Message-----I am now implementing LAVA's kselftest. This kselftest uses kseflftest included in the latest kernel. There are no plans to backport tests to 4.4 or 4.19. I believe that ksefltest included in the CIP kernel is inadequate in function and difficult to use as it is. I suggest using a new kernel test that incorporates the latest tests. Best regards, Nobuhiro
|
|
Jan Kiszka
On 06.03.20 09:21, vijai kumar wrote:
Hi All,CC'ing our kernel maintainers and Chris in case someone has input on this. Vijai, maybe you can say a few words about your integration experience and options to move forward. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
|
|
Vijai Kumar K
Hi All,
Is kselftest maintained in the cip-kernel tree? I do see some branch[1] maintained by Nobuhiro-san for kselftest, but it's out of 5.6 linux tree. The reason being to gather collective thoughts about the plan for kselftest based tests for cip kernel. Are there any existing or future plans for using kselftest for testing cip kernels? If so are we going to use the latest tree from upstream or plan to fix/backport test cases to current cip kernel versions? [1] https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-kernel/linux-cip/-/tree/ci/iwamatsu/linux-cip-kselftest Thanks, Vijai Kumar K
|
|