On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 6:36 PM Alice Ferrazzi via lists.cip-project.org <alice.ferrazzi=miraclelinux.com@...> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 8:24 AM Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
> <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We release v5.10.83-cip1, which is the first release of the CIP 5.10.y Linux kernel !
> > This is based on v5.10.83 with some additional updates for the Renesas reference
> > boards.
> >
> > You can get this release via the git tree at:
> >
> >   v5.10.83-cip1:
> >     repository:
> >       https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/linux-cip.git
> >     branch:
> >       linux-5.10.y-cip
> >     commit hash:
> >       2332f07a324fd78d7c7436deeed23cd7db441ea7
> >     added commits:
> >       CIP: Add a number to the version suffix
> >       dt-bindings: pci: rcar-pci-ep: Document missing interrupts property
> >       dt-bindings: timer: renesas: tmu: Document r8a774e1 bindings
> >       dt-bindings: PCI: rcar-pci-host: Document r8a774e1 bindings
> >       memory: renesas-rpc-if: Make rpcif_enable/disable_rpm() as static inline
> >       spi: spi-mem: Fix passing zero to 'PTR_ERR' warning
> >       clk: renesas: r8a774a1: Add RPC clocks
> >       clk: renesas: r8a774b1: Add RPC clocks
> >       clk: renesas: r8a774c0: Add RPC clocks
> >       pinctrl: renesas: r8a77990: Add QSPI[01] pins, groups and functions
> >       pinctrl: renesas: r8a77990: Optimize pinctrl image size for R8A774C0
> >       pinctrl: renesas: r8a77951: Add QSPI[01] pins, groups and functions
> >       pinctrl: renesas: r8a77951: Optimize pinctrl image size for R8A774E1
> >       pinctrl: renesas: r8a7796: Add QSPI[01] pins, groups and functions
> >       pinctrl: renesas: r8a7796: Optimize pinctrl image size for R8A774A1
> >       pinctrl: renesas: r8a77965: Add QSPI[01] pins, groups and functions
> >       pinctrl: renesas: r8a77965: Optimize pinctrl image size for R8A774B1
> >       Add configuration for gitlab-ci.
> >
>
> In the link here under there is the difference with Linux stable v5.10.83:
> https://www.diffchecker.com/1Ber9vjb
>
> Other than having linux-5.10.y-cip tested on more boards,
> respectively 164 builds vs 184 builds for CIP kernel.
> We could also test CIP kernel on arm64,
> Linux stable looks not yet tested on arm64 with KernelCI.
> I currently don't see any relevant difference from both build tests.

so we don't have a comparison for this test.
--
======================================
Cybertrust Japan Co.,Ltd.
Alice Ferrazzi
alice.ferrazzi@...
======================================