Backporting to the CIP Kernel
Chris Paterson
Hello Ben,
I hope the move went okay.
I plan to start backporting some patches to the CIP Kernel soon, to begin adding support for the Renesas CIP reference platform.
I’ve had a look at [1] and have a few of queries…
1) >11. It or an equivalent fix must already exist in Linus' tree (upstream). Is this rule set in stone? Or can patches that have been accepted into the relevant maintainer’s branches be backported?
Positive: We don’t have to wait up to 10 weeks for the new merge window before backporting patches Negative: There is a small chance that the patches will be rebased in the move from linux-next to linux
2) For submitting patches, I assume you would like them sent to cip-dev?
3) For patches that add support for a new platform, would you like them submitted in small series, as they were upstreamed? Or in one big pull request once major support for the platform has been added upstream?
[1] https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/civilinfrastructureplatform/cipkernelmaintenance
Kind regards, Chris
|
|
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...>
On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 14:53 +0000, Chris Paterson wrote:
Hello Ben,Thanks. It didn't entirely, but the worst is over. I plan to start backporting some patches to the CIP Kernel soon, toI think it would be fine to relax this for new hardware support. There isn't the same risk of regression if the kernel didn't support the hardware before. 2)Yes. You can send a git pull request, but I would like to see the patches on the list even then. 3)Shorter series are more easy for me to digest. Ben. [1] https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/civilinfrastructureplatform/cipkernelmaintenance -- Ben Hutchings Software Developer, Codethink Ltd.
|
|
Chris Paterson
Hello Ben.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Thank you for the quick feedback. Kind regards, Chris
From: Ben Hutchings [mailto:ben.hutchings@...]
|
|