Date
1 - 2 of 2
Update week 47
|
Agustin Benito Bethencourt <agustin.benito@...>
Hi,
++ Meetings * This week the team at Codethink working on CIP has met f2f for the first time in Manchester, since three of us work remotely from home. ** Agreed on basic management processes we will follow. ** We have worked on the roadmap for the coming weeks. ** Moved forward the work on testing. ** You can find us in IRC channel #cip in freenode. ++ Kernel maintenance * There is a consolidation effort of the policies that has been discussed in this mailing list in our public wiki[1]. Ben H. and myself will look into them the following days to polish them. ++ Testing * The testing project has been created in Gitlab. A couple of colleagues at Codethink has picked up the initial effort done by Siemens and move it forward, in order to create a virtual machine with kernelci[2]. **The goal of the first milestone is that any developer with a board at her desk can test a kernel and see the results of those tests in her own machine. ** A tutorial will be published for those of you not familiar with the tools involved. If you are interested in using kernelci in your company, please join our effort. Collaboration is working. ++ Other topics * The CIP whitepaper keeps moving forward. * As reported, CIP Members took as strategic decision to use the tools that for each software component, each upstream community uses. I order to consolidate our work upstream in one place, we will use Gitlab[3]. ** The Gitlab instance is up and running. Feel free to join. Best Regards [1] https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/civilinfrastructureplatform/cipkernelmaintenance [2] https://gitlab.com/cip-project/testing/tree/master [3] https://gitlab.com/cip-project -- Agustin Benito Bethencourt Principal Consultant - FOSS at Codethink agustin.benito@... |
|
|
|
Daniel Sangorrin <daniel.sangorrin@...>
Hi,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
(Cc'ed to Fuego and LTSI mailing lists). -----Original Message-----... ++ TestingI am planning to add support for kernel-ci on Fuego (Jenkins + a bunch of tests) using "https://ci.linaro.org/view/kernel-ci/" as a reference. That is, Fuego will git-trigger and perform kernel builds, and then send the results to a kernel-ci server (e.g. a local vagrant server or https://kernelci.org) using its REST API. My short-term vision is: [Fuego@toshiba] .... ----build results--------> [Kernel-ci@server] [Fuego@<company X>] Fuego can also be used for visualizing the local build results (maybe not as pretty as kernel-ci's dashboard) but as far as I know it doesn't have the kind of back-end API that kernel-ci has. For that reason, although for local testing Fuego is enough, we need a way to publish the results (mostly so that maintainers can see them). However, my long-term vision would be: [Fuego@toshiba] .... ----build/boot/LTP/Cyclictest/other_tests results--------> [Fuego OR modified kernel-ci@server] [Fuego@<company X>] In other words, Build and Boot tests are good but not enough. There are many other tests that we want to run (e.g. tests in Fuego for both the kernel and the root filesystem). I can see at least two options for implementing that: Option 1: Extend kernel-ci to support other type of tests. Option 2: Add a backend REST API to Fuego similar to the one kernel-ci has. Any feedback would be welcome. Best regards, Daniel [1] http://bird.org/ffiles/Introduction-to-Fuego-LCJ-2016.pdf |
|
|